izpis_h1_title_alt

How health care professionals confront and solve ethical dilemmas - a tale of two countries: Slovenia and Croatia
ID Grosek, Štefan (Avtor), ID Kučan, Rok (Avtor), ID Grošelj, Jon (Avtor), ID Oražem, Miha (Avtor), ID Erčulj, Vanja Ida (Avtor), ID Lajovic, Jaro (Avtor), ID Ivanc, Blaž (Avtor), ID Novak, Milivoj (Avtor), ID Prpić Massari, Larisa (Avtor), ID Matanović, Suzana Mimica (Avtor), ID Meštrović, Julije (Avtor), ID Borovečki, Ana (Avtor)

URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite http://www.cmj.hr/2021/62/2/33938651.htm Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (1,27 MB)
MD5: 5534B7361F9F341800F8F8F7CE6CC51A

Izvleček
Aim: To assess the differences in the way how Slovenian and Croatian health care professionals (HCPs) confront ethical dilemmas and perceive the role of hospital ethics committees (HECs). Methods: This cross-sectional, survey-based study involved HCPs from three Slovenian and five Croatian university medical centers (UMC). The final sample sizes were 308 (244 or 79.2% women) for Slovenia and 485 (398 or 82.1% women) for Croatia. Results: Compared with Croatian physicians, Slovenian physicians reported a higher share of ethical dilemmas regarding waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, suboptimal working conditions due to interpersonal relationships in the ward, and end-of-life treatment withdrawal, and a lower share regarding access to palliative care and patient information protection. Compared with Croatian nurses, Slovenian nurses reported a lower share of ethical dilemmas regarding the distribution of limited resources, recognizing the patient's best interests, and access to palliative care. Compared with Croatian other HCPs, Slovenian other HCPs reported a lower burden of ethical dilemmas regarding waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, distribution of limited resources, and access to palliative care. When encountering an ethical dilemma, all HCPs in both countries would first consult their colleagues. Slovenian and Croatian HCPs recognized the importance of the HECs to a similar extent, but viewed their role differently. Conclusion: Croatian and Slovenian HCPs are confronted with different ethical dilemmas and perceive the role of HECs differently.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:health care professionals, ethical dilemmas, hospital ethics committees
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:ZF - Zdravstvena fakulteta
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2021
Št. strani:Str. 120-129
Številčenje:Vol. 62, iss. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-126750 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:614:174
ISSN pri članku:0353-9504
DOI:10.3325/cmj.2021.62.120 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:61959171 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:05.05.2021
Število ogledov:745
Število prenosov:177
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Croatian medical journal
Skrajšan naslov:Croat. med. j.
Založnik:University of Zagreb Medical School
ISSN:0353-9504
COBISS.SI-ID:33135360 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Projekti

Financer:Drugi - Drug financer ali več financerjev
Številka projekta:20140215
Naslov:Project development of the Committee for Medical Ethics University Medical Centre Ljubljana and Clinical Ethics 2014 - 2016

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj