izpis_h1_title_alt

How health care professionals confront and solve ethical dilemmas - a tale of two countries: Slovenia and Croatia
ID Grosek, Štefan (Author), ID Kučan, Rok (Author), ID Grošelj, Jon (Author), ID Oražem, Miha (Author), ID Erčulj, Vanja Ida (Author), ID Lajovic, Jaro (Author), ID Ivanc, Blaž (Author), ID Novak, Milivoj (Author), ID Prpić Massari, Larisa (Author), ID Matanović, Suzana Mimica (Author), ID Meštrović, Julije (Author), ID Borovečki, Ana (Author)

URLURL - Source URL, Visit http://www.cmj.hr/2021/62/2/33938651.htm This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,27 MB)
MD5: 5534B7361F9F341800F8F8F7CE6CC51A

Abstract
Aim: To assess the differences in the way how Slovenian and Croatian health care professionals (HCPs) confront ethical dilemmas and perceive the role of hospital ethics committees (HECs). Methods: This cross-sectional, survey-based study involved HCPs from three Slovenian and five Croatian university medical centers (UMC). The final sample sizes were 308 (244 or 79.2% women) for Slovenia and 485 (398 or 82.1% women) for Croatia. Results: Compared with Croatian physicians, Slovenian physicians reported a higher share of ethical dilemmas regarding waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, suboptimal working conditions due to interpersonal relationships in the ward, and end-of-life treatment withdrawal, and a lower share regarding access to palliative care and patient information protection. Compared with Croatian nurses, Slovenian nurses reported a lower share of ethical dilemmas regarding the distribution of limited resources, recognizing the patient's best interests, and access to palliative care. Compared with Croatian other HCPs, Slovenian other HCPs reported a lower burden of ethical dilemmas regarding waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, distribution of limited resources, and access to palliative care. When encountering an ethical dilemma, all HCPs in both countries would first consult their colleagues. Slovenian and Croatian HCPs recognized the importance of the HECs to a similar extent, but viewed their role differently. Conclusion: Croatian and Slovenian HCPs are confronted with different ethical dilemmas and perceive the role of HECs differently.

Language:English
Keywords:health care professionals, ethical dilemmas, hospital ethics committees
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2021
Number of pages:Str. 120-129
Numbering:Vol. 62, iss. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-126750 This link opens in a new window
UDC:614:174
ISSN on article:0353-9504
DOI:10.3325/cmj.2021.62.120 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:61959171 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:05.05.2021
Views:760
Downloads:177
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Croatian medical journal
Shortened title:Croat. med. j.
Publisher:University of Zagreb Medical School
ISSN:0353-9504
COBISS.SI-ID:33135360 This link opens in a new window

Projects

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Project number:20140215
Name:Project development of the Committee for Medical Ethics University Medical Centre Ljubljana and Clinical Ethics 2014 - 2016

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back