Podrobno

A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis platforms : Myval, Sapien, and Evolut in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and low-moderate risk patients
ID Bunc, Matjaž (Avtor), ID Steblovnik, Klemen (Avtor), ID Terseglav, Simon (Avtor), ID Ambrožič, Jana (Avtor), ID Bervar, Mojca (Avtor), ID Dimitrovska, Ljupka (Avtor), ID Čerček, Miha (Avtor), ID Kovač, Ana (Avtor), ID Mohorko-Pleskovič, Patricija (Avtor), ID Kogoj, Polonca (Avtor), ID Fras, Zlatko (Avtor), ID Šušteršič, Miha (Avtor), ID Vrtovec, Bojan (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (1,14 MB)
MD5: C7EDF056CDA87CFE7B1633FD507114A7
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/raon-2025-0046 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Background This article compares the real-world performance and safety of the three transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) platforms: Myval, Sapien, and Evolut in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and low to moderate surgical risk. Patients and methods Between September 2019 and September 2023, 1053 TAVI procedures were performed in the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia. We used propensity-score match analysis to compare the Myval, Sapien, and Evolut platforms. 180 patients were enrolled in the propensity-score matching study, 60 for each platform. The study endpoints included haemodynamic outcomes compared to baseline, in-hospital clinical safety outcomes, and all-cause mortality at 30 days and one year. Results Changes in peak aortic valve velocity, mean aortic gradient, effective orifice area, and left ventricular ejection fraction were comparable between the platforms. After propensity score matching (tri-match), the rates of stroke (3.4% vs. 3.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.548), life-threatening bleeding (1.7% vs. 1.7% vs. 1.7 %), periprocedural myocardial infarction (3.3% vs. 0.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.330), postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation rate (11.9% vs. 10.2% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.719), all-cause mortality at 30 days (3.3% vs. 5.0% vs. 3.3%; p = 1.000) and at 1 year (8.3% vs. 8.3% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.934) were comparable between the Myval, Sapien, and Evolut series, respectively. 2 cases of moderate paravalvular regurgitation were reported, one in Myval, and one in Sapien series. Conclusions The tri-match analysis of the real-world aortic stenosis patients with low to moderate surgical risk treated with the Myval, Sapien, and Evolut series showed comparable performance, safety, efficacy, and survival.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:transcatheter aortic valve implantation, aortic stenosis, real-world comparison
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:MF - Medicinska fakulteta
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2025
Št. strani:Str. 498-509, IV
Številčenje:Vol. 59, no. 4
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-185581 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:616.126
ISSN pri članku:1318-2099
DOI:10.2478/raon-2025-0046 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:271727107 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:11.08.2026
Število ogledov:36
Število prenosov:13
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Radiology and oncology
Skrajšan naslov:Radiol. oncol.
Založnik:Association of Radiology and Oncology
ISSN:1318-2099
COBISS.SI-ID:32649472 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Naslov:Primerjava perkutanih aortnih zaklopk Myval, Sapien in Evolut pri simptomatskih bolnikih z aortno stenozo in nizkim do zmernim kirurškim tveganjem
Ključne besede:perkutana zamenjava aortne zaklopke, aortna stenoza

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj