Podrobno

Melatonin vs. dexmedetomidine for sleep induction in children before electroencephalography
ID Peganc, Katja (Avtor), ID Neubauer, David (Avtor), ID Oražem, Jasna (Avtor), ID Perković-Benedik, Mirjana (Avtor), ID Mahne, Urška (Avtor), ID Bizjak, Neli (Avtor), ID Rener-Primec, Zvonka (Avtor), ID Šuštar, Nataša (Avtor), ID Butenko, Tita (Avtor), ID Vrščaj, Eva (Avtor), ID Osredkar, Damjan (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (625,42 KB)
MD5: B6D04D414DF4B5C085FA04AD1F3F2050
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2024.1362918/full Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Background and objectives: In children requiring electroencephalography (EEG), sleep recording can provide crucial information. As EEG recordings during spontaneous sleep are not always possible, pharmacological sleepinducing agents are sometimes required. The aim of the study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of melatonin (Mel) and dexmedetomidine (Dex; intranasal and sublingual application) for sleep induction prior to EEG. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 156 consecutive patients aged 1–19 years were enrolled and randomized by draw into melatonin group (Mel; n = 54; dose: 0.1 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (Dex) sublingual group (DexL; n = 51; dose: 3 mcg/kg) or dexmedetomidine intranasal group (DexN; n = 51; dose: 3 mcg/kg). We compared the groups in several parameters regarding efficacy and safety and also carried out a separate analysis for a subgroup of patients with complex behavioral problems. Results: Sleep was achieved in 93.6% of participants after the first application of the drug and in 99.4% after the application of another if needed. Mel was effective as the first drug in 83.3% and Dex in 99.0% (p < 0.001); in the subgroup of patients with complex developmental problems Mel was effective in 73.4% and Dex in 100% (p < 0.001). The patients fell asleep faster after intranasal application of Dex than after sublingual application (p = 0.006). None of the patients had respiratory depression, bradycardia, desaturation, or hypotension. Conclusions: Mel and Dex are both safe for sleep induction prior to EEG recording in children. Dex is more effective compared to Mel in inducing sleep, also in the subgroup of children with complex behavioral problems.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:melatonin, dexmedetomidine, electroencephalography, EEG, sleep, sleep induction
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:MF - Medicinska fakulteta
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2024
Št. strani:7 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 12, art. 1362918
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-183265 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:616-053.2
ISSN pri članku:2296-2360
DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1362918 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:195713539 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:10.06.2026
Število ogledov:94
Število prenosov:89
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Frontiers in pediatrics
Skrajšan naslov:Front. pediatr.
Založnik:Frontiers Media S.A.
ISSN:2296-2360
COBISS.SI-ID:523096601 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj