Podrobno

Comparison of average glandular dose in mammography for patients with breast implants when using automatic or manual exposure technique
ID Šimunović Simić, Anja (Avtor), ID Alukić, Erna (Avtor), ID Jurša, Laura (Avtor), ID Marolt-Mušič, Maja (Avtor), ID Mekiš, Nejc (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (613,71 KB)
MD5: E4018B69B8881D819A387EF40623270E
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25005303 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(25)00530-3/fulltext Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the average glandular dose (AGD) in mammography screening of women with breast implants and to compare the AGD and image quality obtained with automatic exposure control (AEC) versus manual exposure settings with standard and Eklund techniques (implant displacement). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 536 patients with breast implants from a national screening program using mammography equipment from a single vendor (Hologic Selenia Dimensions) was performed. Each patient underwent eight images; four standard (CC, MLO) and four Eklund (CCID, MLOID) projections. Exposure parameters, breast thickness, compression force and AGD were assessed. A subset of 35 patients (eight images each) who underwent two consecutive mammograms with different exposure settings (AEC and manual) underwent image quality assessment using a standardized PGMI classification, which was evaluated by three radiologists experienced in mammography reporting. Results: AGD was significantly higher with AEC in standard projections (CC, MLO), but lower in Eklund projections (CCID, MLOID) than with manual exposure (p < 0.001). Manual exposure settings resulted in better image quality in standard projections, while no significant differences were observed in CCID images. For four out of six quality criteria, MLOID images were superior to manual settings. Conclusion: AEC leads to lower AGD in implant displacement projections, but increases AGD in standard projections. Manual exposure settings resulted in better image quality for CC, MLO and MLOID projections, while IQ was at an acceptable level even when using AEC. The results emphasize that standard projection mammography in patients with breast implants should be performed with manual exposure settings, while ID projections should be performed with AEC while maintaining sufficient IQ.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:mammography with breast implant, Eklund technique, image quality, radiation dose
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:ZF - Zdravstvena fakulteta
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2025
Št. strani:6 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 193, art. 112444
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-176666 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:616-073:618.19-006-07
ISSN pri članku:1872-7727
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112444 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:250533379 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:08.12.2025
Število ogledov:409
Število prenosov:250
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:European journal of radiology
Založnik:Elsevier
ISSN:1872-7727
COBISS.SI-ID:23232005 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj