Despite efforts toward deinstitutionalization, many residential groups still retain characteristics of total institutions. Users often face institutional rules, a lack of privacy, and limited influence over everyday decisions. Residential groups are increasingly being established as a kind of final structure rather than merely a transitional form on the path to greater user independence.
In the theoretical part, I define deviance, stigmatization, total institutions and their impact on the individual, and the process of deinstitutionalization in Slovenia, with a focus on the reform process of the social welfare institution Dom na Krasu. The development of the concept of normalization and Brandon’s five principles is presented, serving as a basis for evaluating the quality of life of users in institutions. The conclusion of the theoretical section also outlines the forms of support and assistance used in institutional care.
The empirical part, based on qualitative research, will include interviews with users of the residential group at Dom na Krasu to gather data about their lived experience. I will examine how the (non-)implementation of Brandon’s principles of normalization is reflected in users’ lives, what forms of support and assistance are provided by residential groups, and what barriers exist in applying these principles. The findings of the research will enhance the understanding of individuals living in residential groups and their needs and will highlight the obstacles they face on the path toward a more independent life. Moreover, the findings will encourage reflection on the further development of user-centred community services.
|
