The Master's thesis examines the procedural guarantees, as ensured within the proceedings for issuing interim measures in administrative disputes. The Master's thesis is divided into three parts. The first part addresses the institution of interim measures in general: their normative regulation, fundamental characteristics, and procedural prerequisites. The second part, which constitutes the core of the thesis, delves into individual procedural guarantees, stemming primarily from Article 22 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, such as the right to be heard, the right to be informed of procedural acts, the right to present evidence, the right to a reasoned judicial decision, the right to a public hearing, and the right to a legal remedy. This is approached first through a theoretical analysis and then by highlighting their implementation in the case law of the Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia and the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia. In the final, third part, the differences between civil proceedings involving interim measures and administrative disputes are initially presented. It then presents the procedural guarantees in civil court proceedings with interim measures and analyzes whether the regulations from civil procedure involving interim measures can be applied to administrative disputes. The Master's thesis examines the extent to which fundamental guarantees are, in practice, actually and fully realized, and how their (non-)implementation affects the equality of parties and the fairness of the proceedings.
|
