Introduction: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is the only method for early detection of lung cancer that has been shown to reduce mortality. The acceptable average effective dose for lung cancer screening with CT is approximately 1.5 mSv, while patients may receive up to 7 mSv with a standard chest CT. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine how varying the tube current (mAs) at a fixed tube voltage (kV) affects the radiation dose and image quality in chest CT imaging. We aim to obtain an optimized protocol without the use of additional filtration, suitable for lung cancer screening and follow-up imaging. Methods: The study was divided into two parts. In the first part, we used a phantom for measurements. We performed 57 CT scans: 3 using the standard protocol, 27 with manual exposure, and 27 with automatic exposure control (AEC). The second part was performed on 152 patients referred for follow-up chest CT imaging. A fixed tube voltage and two different tube current settings were used for imaging. With the first protocol, we scanned 76 patients with a body mass index (BMI) below 30, while the second protocol was used for 76 patients with a BMI of 30 or higher. In all patients, height, weight, DLP, CTDIvol, and both reference and effective tube currents were recorded. Additionally, both subjective and objective image quality assessments were obtained. Results: In the first part, we used measurements on a phantom to determine the most suitable protocols for imaging patients. In the second part, we found that there are statistically significant differences between the new and standard protocol in reference and effective tube currents (p<0.001), DLP (p<0.001), CTDIvol (p<0.001), CNR (p<0.001), and SNR (p<0.001). In the subjective assessment of image quality, we found statistically significant differences between the optimized protocols for all evaluation criteria, except for overall image quality (p=0.073). The total image score was higher with the protocol for patients with a high BMI (p=0.009). Discussion and conclusion: The use of high fixed tube voltage and low tube current reduces the radiation dose by 40–60 %. Image quality degrades with optimization, but it is still adequate for diagnostic purposes. We obtained an optimized protocol suitable for use in a lung cancer screening program and follow-up imaging.
|