Pravno odločanje in razlaga prava v luči razvoja umetne inteligence

Korljan, Ambrož (avtor), Novak, Aleš (mentor)

Magistrska naloga se osredinja na odprta vprašanja uvajanja umetne inteligence v pravno odločanje in sposobnost te tehnologije pravo razlagati. Umetno inteligenco je v pravno odločanje mogoče uvesti na različne načine, pri čemer je v tem kontekstu predstavljen koncept človeka v obroču (human in the loop). Obroč tvorita posameznik in tehnologija, ki v procesu sprejema določene odločitve prevzameta določene vloge, ki so v izbranih delih predstavljene. Umetna inteligenca je v delu analizirana tudi s tehničnega vidika, zlasti v okvirih in obsegu, ki je po mojem mnenju relevanten za pravno znanost. Umetna inteligenca zaradi svojih načinov delovanja, ne opravlja (para)kognicijskega procesa na enak način kot ga opravlja človek ko razlaga pravo. Zato so metode razlage, kot so uveljavljene v pravni znanosti in pravosodni praksi, izven dometa uporabe umetne inteligence, kar je argumentirano predstavljeno v osrednjem delu magistrskega dela. Prav tako umetna inteligenca, ne zmore tvoriti volje. To naziranje, v luči opravljene primerjalnopravne analize, predstavlja bistveno oviro pri uvajanju umetne inteligence v pravno odločanje. Analizirana je tudi evropska zakonodaja in sodna praksa sodišča EU, zlasti iz vidika pravice do pojasnitve, ki je plod razlage določb Uredbe 2016/679.

• Jezik: Slovenski jezik
• Ključne besede: umetna inteligenca - razlaga prava- človek v obroču - pravno odločanje - pravica do pojasnitve
• Vrsta gradiva: Magistrsko delo/naloga
• Organizacija: PF - Pravna fakulteta
• Leto izida: 2025
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-169084
• COBISS.SI-ID: 238237955
• Datum objave v RUL: 10.05.2025

Sekundarni jezik

• Jezik: Angleški jezik
• Naslov: Legal Decision-Making and the Interpretation of Law in Light of Artificial Intelligence Development

Izvleček

The master's thesis focuses on the issues surrounding the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into legal decision-making and the capability of such technology to interpret the law. AI can be introduced into legal decision-making in various ways; in this context, the concept of the "human in the loop" is presented. The "loop" consists of both a human and a technological component, each assuming specific roles in the decision-making process, which are outlined in selected sections of the thesis. The thesis also addresses artificial intelligence from a technical perspective, particularly within the scope and depth deemed relevant to legal science. Due to its operational mechanisms, AI does not engage in (para)cognitive processes in the same manner as a human lawyer when interpreting the law. Consequently, established methods of legal interpretation, as recognized in legal theory and judicial practice, fall outside the functional capacity of AI—an argument substantiated in the central part of the thesis. Moreover, I argue that AI is inherently incapable of forming will. This position, supported by a comparative legal analysis, represents a fundamental obstacle to the deployment of AI in legal decision making. The thesis further examines European legislation and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, with particular emphasis on the right to explanation as derived from the interpretation of the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

• Ključne besede: artificial intelligence – legal interpretation – human in the loop – legal decision-making – right to explanation