This master’s thesis focuses on a critical analysis of the consumer’s right of withdrawal from a contract in light of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly within the framework of European Union law governing distance contracts. The central hypothesis is that the current EU consumer legislation on distance contracts is not aligned with the SDGs, as it fails to provide adequate protection against harmful environmental impacts. Legal regulation should support environmental, social, and economic goals consistent with the requirements of sustainable development. The thesis begins with a general theoretical overview and the legal framework of the right of withdrawal. It then addresses the Sustainable Development Goals, their significance for global well-being, and the impact of human activity and consumer habits on climate change. This is followed by a critical analysis of the current EU legislation regarding the right of withdrawal. The analysis focuses on three key aspects: withdrawal without justification, reimbursement of costs upon withdrawal, and the right to test goods during the withdrawal period along with the potential reduction in the value of goods. The thesis examines how frequent returns of goods contribute to increased environmental burdens and explores potential improvements in legislation that would better align the right of withdrawal with sustainable development goals. In conclusion, it summarizes the findings that the current regulation of the consumer’s right of withdrawal is not consistent with sustainable development objectives, and therefore legislative reform is necessary — one that promotes a circular economy, mindful consumption, and a balanced distribution of rights and responsibilities among all stakeholders.
|
