izpis_h1_title_alt

Towards a critique of mediatisation
ID Amon Prodnik, Jernej (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (341,66 KB)
MD5: 66EA15CB2231D7425C6011508EAE25C8
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/1505 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Mediatisation has established itself in the last decade as a key approach in media and communication studies. Its aim is to explain the vast transformations of social relations caused by the growing power of the media. I provide a theoretical and empirical critique of this approach, with a particular focus on the institutionalist (strong) approach to mediatisation. As I argue, one of the biggest problems of mediatisation is that it perceives the power of the media in a wholly abstract manner. Even though authors advocating for the mediatisation approach typically preach about holism, their works often narrowly focus on the media, without embedding them in the social totality. This leads to a flawed approach, primarily due to the excessive media-centrism. For a critique of the ontological, epistemological and theoretical failures of mediatisation, I largely base the article on two critical approaches to the media and communication research: critical sociology of the media and political economy of communication. Empirically and mostly for illustrative purposes, the article is based on semi-structured interviews with representatives of Slovenian political parties. Three fundamental issues are identified based on this focus of the paper: mediatisation fails to distinguish between the form and con- tent of communication; it does not make a proper distinction between public political communication and political activity; and it ignores the non-public parts of politics and deep inequalities, which influence the political process. Mediatisation generally bypasses these issues, in turn also ignoring the wider relations of power in capitalist society and how they change.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:mediatisation, political communication, media logic, political parties, sociology of the media, political economy of communication
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FDV - Fakulteta za družbene vede
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2024
Št. strani:Str. 476-497
Številčenje:Vol. 22, no. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-165037 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:316.774:329(497.4)
ISSN pri članku:1726-670X
DOI:10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1505 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:198312963 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:21.11.2024
Število ogledov:29
Število prenosov:1
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:TripleC
Založnik:Institute of Design and Technology Assessment
ISSN:1726-670X
COBISS.SI-ID:28025693 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY-NC-ND 3.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 3.0 Nedoločena
Povezava:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.sl
Opis:Dovoljuje kopiranje in razširjanje vsebin v kakršnemkoli mediju in obliki. Primerno morate navesti avtorja, povezavo do licence in označiti spremembe, če so kakšne nastale. To lahko storite na kakršenkoli razumen način, vendar ne na način, ki bi namigoval na to, da dajalec licence podpira vas ali vašo uporabo dela. Te vsebine ne smete uporabiti v komercialne namene. Če vsebino predelate (remixate), uredite ali na njej gradite, spremenjene vsebine ne smete razširjati. Ne smete uporabiti pravnih določil ali tehničnih ukrepov, ki bi pravno omejili ali onemogočilo druge, da bi storili karkoli, kar licenca dovoli.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:mediji, politično komuniciranje, politične stranke, Slovenija

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj