In my master's thesis, I focused on researching polyamory and the experiences of polyamorous individuals living in Slovenia. The theoretical part defines key terms related to polyamory, including new Slovenian translations. It provides an overview of the history of intimate relationships and reviews modern forms of non-monogamous relationships, focusing on polyamory. It addresses definitions, types, and its significance in the LGBTQ+ community, examines the presence of polyamory globally and in Slovenia, and explores the phenomenon of polyamorous families and polygamy. It also reviews research on psychosocial support for polyamorous individuals and their inclusion in social work. The empirical part presents the results of a qualitative study involving thirteen individuals who identify as polyamorous. The research showed that these individuals associate polyamory primarily with love for multiple people, a sense of freedom, personal growth, and communication. Motivations for polyamory stem from the experience of love, exploration of LGBTQ+ identities, and alignment with personal values and needs. In some cases, they practised polyamory before being familiar with the terminology, but before that, they often experienced guilt and challenges in monogamous relationships. The polyamorous relationships of the participants are diverse, and their partners usually know each other and form friendships. A key emphasis of the interviewed polyamorous individuals was transparent communication about expectations, boundaries, and emotions, which they find more fulfilling than in monogamous relationships. When it comes to revealing their polyamory, individuals are cautious due to fear of societal judgment, although they also notice increasing interest in alternative relationship forms. They rarely hide their relationships from their children, as they wish to raise them in line with their values and principles. Community plays a crucial role in normalising experiences and providing a social network. Although many polyamorous communities exist abroad, there is a lack of them in Slovenia, highlighting the need for their development. Psychosocial support was positively received in some cases, while in others, polyamorous individuals encountered misunderstanding and pathologisation. Professionals in the fields of psychotherapy, psychology, and social work should have a better understanding of polyamory, as this could improve the quality of services provided. Polyamory is still underrecognized in science and social work in Slovenia, but the results of this research indicate the need for its inclusion in education and legal systems. Professionals must be aware of the challenges polyamorous individuals face in a mono-normative society, making further research and interdisciplinary collaboration essential.
|