In the thesis, we compared the results of static and kinematic RTK GNSS survey and analysed the possibility of improving the accuracy of point positioning in kinematic RTK measurements. It is known that the coordinates of points from kinematic RTK measurements, compared to static GNSS measurements, are of lower quality, mainly due to the still-present biases within network-based RTK solutions. We were interested, whether it is possible to improve an RTK survey so that the accuracy of results would be more comparable to that of static measurements. The method was tested using three geodetic points on the roof of the Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering in Ljubljana. We compared the coordinates obtained from the kinematic RTK measurements with those determined by static measurements and looked for the presence of systematic offset between the two sets of coordinates. We found this systematic shift to be present and removed it computationally. With the RMS values of the differences between the two sets of coordinates, the first determined by kinematic measurement methods and the second determined by static measurement, we showed that after removing the shift, the accuracy of the final coordinates of the points determined by RTK measurement by linking to the national network of permanent GNSS stations, SIGNAL, improves.
|
