izpis_h1_title_alt

Obvezno cepljenje v luči problematike COVID-19
ID Gjorevski, Stefan (Avtor), ID Žnidaršič Skubic, Viktorija (Mentor) Več o mentorju... Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (724,92 KB)
MD5: ED19F46D00A46F5373115E2206E06225

Izvleček
Zgodovinsko gledano so bili z obveznim cepljenjem doseženi izjemni rezultati pri zatiranju različnih nalezljivih boleznih. Obvezno cepljenje proti številnim nalezljivim boleznim, ki ga poznamo tudi v Republiki Sloveniji, ima zadostno zakonsko podlago, katere skladnost z Ustavo je potrdilo tudi Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije (USRS). Medicinska stroka je ključna pri ocenjevanju širjenja ter nevarnosti določenih bolezni, zato je odločitev, katero cepljenje naj bi bilo obvezno in kako doseči kolektivno imunost, prepuščena predvsem oceni medicinske stroke. Vendar pa ocena medicinske stroke, da je potrebno obvezno cepljenje proti denimo COVID-19, ne pomeni, da bo zakonodajalec obvezno cepljenje proti COVID-19 nujno uzakonil, temveč obstajajo tudi postopki, s katerimi je potrebno preveriti varnost ter kakovost posameznega cepiva proti COVID-19. Posamezniki, ki imajo medicinsko upravičljiv razlog, lahko na podlagi zakona sprožijo postopek o opustitvi cepljenja, v katerem Ministrstvo za zdravje na podlagi mnenja Komisije za cepljenja izda upravno odločbo, katere zakonitost se lahko presoja v upravnem sporu. Posameznikom, ki jim je zaradi obveznega cepljenja nastala škoda, pa je država odškodninsko odgovorna. V primeru, kadar je škoda nastala zaradi kršitev pravil stroke ali zaradi (ne)privolitve pacienta v zdravstveni poseg, pa je odškodninsko odgovorna zdravstvena organizacija oz. zdravnik. Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice je, podobno kot Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije, tehtalo med posameznimi človekovimi pravicami ter ugotovilo skladnost obveznega cepljenja s pravico do zasebnega in družinskega življenja.

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:Obvezno cepljenje, odškodninska odgovornost, COVID-19 cepivo, kolektivna imunost, informirana privolitev, ESČP.
Vrsta gradiva:Magistrsko delo/naloga
Organizacija:PF - Pravna fakulteta
Leto izida:2023
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-152169 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:174500099 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:09.11.2023
Število ogledov:738
Število prenosov:77
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Naslov:Compulsory vaccination in the light of the COVID-19 issue
Izvleček:
Historically, compulsory vaccination has achieved remarkable results in the control of various infectious diseases. Compulsory vaccination against a number of infectious diseases, which is also known in the Republic of Slovenia, has a sufficient legal basis, the compatibility of which with the Constitution has been confirmed by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia. The medical profession is key in assessing the spread and the risk of certain diseases, so which vaccination should be compulsory in order to achieve herd immunity is primarily a matter for the medical profession to assess. However, the medical profession's assessment of the need for compulsory vaccination against, for example, COVID-19 does not mean that the legislator will necessarily legislate for compulsory vaccination against COVID-19, but there are also procedures in place to verify the safety and quality of a particular COVID-19 vaccine. Individuals who have a medically justifiable reason may, on the basis of the law, initiate a procedure for the waiver of vaccination, in which the Ministry of Health, on the basis of the opinion of the Vaccination Commission, will issue an administrative decision, the lawfulness of which may be reviewed in an administrative litigation. The State is liable in damages to individuals who have suffered harm as a result of compulsory vaccination. However, in the case of damage caused by breaches of professional rules or by the patient's (lack of) consent to a medical procedure, the liability for damages lies with the health care organization or the doctor. The European Court of Human Rights, like the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, has weighed the balance between individual human rights and found compulsory vaccination to be compatible with the right to private and family life.

Ključne besede:Compulsory vaccination, liability for damages, COVID-19 vaccine, herd immunity, informed consent, ECHR.

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj