izpis_h1_title_alt

Exploring arXiv usage habits among Slovenian scientists
ID Metelko, Zala (Avtor), ID Maver, Jasna (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (448,07 KB)
MD5: 4A44F50885AA213392C66D42FEC1D71A
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-07-2022-0162/full/html Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Purpose – This study investigates how important the preprint arXiv is for Slovenian scientists, whether there are differences between scientific disciplines and the reputation of arXiv among Slovenian scientists. We are also interested in what advantages and disadvantages scientists see in using arXiv. Design/methodology/approach – A voluntary sample of active researchers from the scientific fields covered by arXiv was used. Data were collected over 21 days in September 2021 using a 40-question online survey. In addition to descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistical methods such as Pearson’s chi-squared test for independence, Kruskal-Wallis’ H-test and Mann-Whitney’s U-test were applied to the collected data. Findings – Among Slovenian scientists there is a wide range of different users of arXiv. The authors note differences among scientific disciplines. Physicists and astronomers are the most engaged, followed by mathematicians. Researchers in computer science, electrical engineering and systems science seem to have recognized the benefits of the archive, but are still hesitant to use it. Researchers from the other scientific fields participated in the survey to a lesser extent, suggesting that arXiv is less popular in these scientific fields. For Slovenian scientists, the main advantages of arXiv are faster access to knowledge, open access, greater impact of scientists’ work and the fact that publishing in the archive is free of charge. A negative aspect of using the archive is the frustration caused by the difficulties in assessing the credibility of articles. Research limitations/implications – A voluntary sample was used, which attracted a larger number of researchers but has a higher risk of sampling bias. Practical implications – The results are useful for international comparisons, but also provide bases and recommendations for institutional and national policies to evaluate researchers and their performance. Originality/value – The results provide valuable insights into arXiv usage habits and the reasons for using or not using arXiv by Slovenian scientists. There is no comparable study conducted in Slovenia.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:scientific literature, scholarly publishing, preprint servers, Slovenia, arXiv, international studies
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FF - Filozofska fakulteta
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2023
Št. strani:Str. 72-94
Številčenje:Vol. 79, no. 7
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-147267 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:655.41
ISSN pri članku:0022-0418
DOI:10.1108/JD-07-2022-0162 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:154496771 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:28.06.2023
Število ogledov:975
Število prenosov:68
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Journal of documentation
Skrajšan naslov:J. doc.
Založnik:Emerald
ISSN:0022-0418
COBISS.SI-ID:6866437 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:znanstvena literatura, znanstveno založništvo, strežniki za predtisk, Slovenija

Projekti

Financer:ARRS - Agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:P2-0214
Naslov:Računalniški vid

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj