izpis_h1_title_alt

Exploring arXiv usage habits among Slovenian scientists
ID Metelko, Zala (Author), ID Maver, Jasna (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (448,07 KB)
MD5: 4A44F50885AA213392C66D42FEC1D71A
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-07-2022-0162/full/html This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Purpose – This study investigates how important the preprint arXiv is for Slovenian scientists, whether there are differences between scientific disciplines and the reputation of arXiv among Slovenian scientists. We are also interested in what advantages and disadvantages scientists see in using arXiv. Design/methodology/approach – A voluntary sample of active researchers from the scientific fields covered by arXiv was used. Data were collected over 21 days in September 2021 using a 40-question online survey. In addition to descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistical methods such as Pearson’s chi-squared test for independence, Kruskal-Wallis’ H-test and Mann-Whitney’s U-test were applied to the collected data. Findings – Among Slovenian scientists there is a wide range of different users of arXiv. The authors note differences among scientific disciplines. Physicists and astronomers are the most engaged, followed by mathematicians. Researchers in computer science, electrical engineering and systems science seem to have recognized the benefits of the archive, but are still hesitant to use it. Researchers from the other scientific fields participated in the survey to a lesser extent, suggesting that arXiv is less popular in these scientific fields. For Slovenian scientists, the main advantages of arXiv are faster access to knowledge, open access, greater impact of scientists’ work and the fact that publishing in the archive is free of charge. A negative aspect of using the archive is the frustration caused by the difficulties in assessing the credibility of articles. Research limitations/implications – A voluntary sample was used, which attracted a larger number of researchers but has a higher risk of sampling bias. Practical implications – The results are useful for international comparisons, but also provide bases and recommendations for institutional and national policies to evaluate researchers and their performance. Originality/value – The results provide valuable insights into arXiv usage habits and the reasons for using or not using arXiv by Slovenian scientists. There is no comparable study conducted in Slovenia.

Language:English
Keywords:scientific literature, scholarly publishing, preprint servers, Slovenia, arXiv, international studies
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 72-94
Numbering:Vol. 79, no. 7
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-147267 This link opens in a new window
UDC:655.41
ISSN on article:0022-0418
DOI:10.1108/JD-07-2022-0162 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:154496771 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:28.06.2023
Views:585
Downloads:28
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Journal of documentation
Shortened title:J. doc.
Publisher:Emerald
ISSN:0022-0418
COBISS.SI-ID:6866437 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:znanstvena literatura, znanstveno založništvo, strežniki za predtisk, Slovenija

Projects

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P2-0214
Name:Računalniški vid

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back