izpis_h1_title_alt

Evaluation of biosecurity measures in pig holdings in Slovenia as a risk assessment for the introduction of African Swine Fever virus
ID Plut, Jan (Avtor), ID Knific, Tanja (Avtor), ID Golinar, Irena (Avtor), ID Vengušt, Gorazd (Avtor), ID Štukelj, Marina (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (616,04 KB)
MD5: 82FDA6924034301768DDAF8F9748ACF7
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/3/434 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
African Swine Fever (ASF) is persistently spreading and hindering pork production in Europe. Slovenia is one of the last countries in Central Europe without a confirmed ASF case in domestic pigs or in wild boar. The aim of this study was to assess the current biosecurity implementation on different types of pig farms. Internal and external biosecurity status was determined in 17 commercial (CF), 15 non-commercial (NC), and 15 outdoor (O) farms. Data were collected using the Biocheck.UGent questionnaire and assessed in combination with the latest information on the wild boar population in Slovenia. Biosecurity was compared between farm types based on the assessment of 12 subcategories. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in six subcategories: (i) purchase of pigs and semen, (ii) visitors and farmworkers, (iii) vermin and bird control, (iv) finishing unit, (v) measures between compartments and use of equipment, and (vi) cleaning and disinfection. The highest total biosecurity score (0–100%) was determined on CF with 64.59 ± 16.47%, followed by NC with 55.73 ± 10.67%, and O with 48.47 ± 8.20%. The density of the wild boar population was estimated from the number of wild boars per km2 per year, with 3 or more hunted wild boars per unit representing the highest density. Geolocation of farms on the wild boar population map showed that two O farms are at high risk and seven farms (1 O, 5 NC, and 1 CF) are at medium risk for disease transmission from wild to domestic pigs. Biosecurity measures must be tightened in some subcategories, especially in areas with a high density of wild boar.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:African swine fever, biosecurity, commercial pig farms, non-commercial pig farms, outdoor pig farms, risk assessment
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:VF - Veterinarska fakulteta
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2023
Št. strani:11 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 12, no. 3, [article no.] 434
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-144750 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:636.4.09:616
ISSN pri članku:2076-0817
DOI:10.3390/pathogens12030434 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:144725507 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:10.03.2023
Število ogledov:472
Število prenosov:51
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Pathogens
Skrajšan naslov:Pathogens
Založnik:MDPI
ISSN:2076-0817
COBISS.SI-ID:523338009 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.
Začetek licenciranja:10.03.2023

Projekti

Financer:ARRS - Agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:P4-0092
Naslov:Zdravje živali, okolje in varna hrana

Financer:ARRS - Agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:V4-2039
Naslov:Ocena tveganja vnosa virusa afriške prašičje kuge v reje prašičev

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj