izpis_h1_title_alt

Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more
ID Kirkland, Hannah (Avtor), ID Hare, Darragh (Avtor), ID Daniels, Mike (Avtor), ID Krofel, Miha (Avtor), ID Rao, Shaila (Avtor), ID Chapman, Tatiana (Avtor), ID Blossey, Bernd (Avtor)

URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (235,40 KB)
MD5: A2BF7CAF043E266AE52D70C53F95E95B

Izvleček
What would successful deer management look like in Scotland? To some, flourishing populations of native wild deer represent success. But to others, negative impacts such as damage to woodlands and peatlands, agricultural and forestry losses, deervehicle collisions, and facilitating Lyme disease spread represent failure. Conflicting interests and incentives among people involved in deer management mean a common definition of success, and therefore clear management targets, remain elusive. While some environmental groups urgently call for an increase in the number of deer culled (shot) each year, other stakeholders aim to maximize deer numbers. Overcoming this governance failure will require clearly articulated, scientifically valid, and socially acceptable socio-ecological objectives to be co-produced by a broad range of stakeholders. Systematic monitoring of deer impacts will also be needed to evaluate the ability of specific management interventions to achieve defined objectives. Reintroducing Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) has been suggested as a means to reduce deer numbers and their negative ecological and socioeconomic impacts. However, evidence of lynx impacts on deer numbers, deer impacts, and social conflicts over deer suggest lynx reintroduction alone would not effectively reduce negative impacts of deer in Scotland, though it could be part of a broader solution. In the short-term, achieving sustainable numbers of deer in Scotland will require a substantial increase in the number of deer culled and effective changes to the way deer management is incentivized, regulated, implemented, and monitored.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:wildlife governance, deer management, lynx reintroduction, ecological restoration, conservation conflic
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:BF - Biotehniška fakulteta
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Poslano v recenzijo:03.09.2021
Datum sprejetja članka:05.11.2021
Datum objave:26.11.2021
Leto izida:2021
Št. strani:6 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 2, article 770303
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-133571 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:630*15
ISSN pri članku:2673-611X
DOI:10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:87328515 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:01.12.2021
Število ogledov:967
Število prenosov:147
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Frontiers in conservation science
Skrajšan naslov:Front. conserv. sci.
Založnik:Frontiers
ISSN:2673-611X
COBISS.SI-ID:63981827 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.
Začetek licenciranja:01.12.2021

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:upravljanje, jelenjad, srnjad, ponovna naselitev, evrazijski ris, restavracija, naravovarstveni konflikt

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj