izpis_h1_title_alt

Exploring options for flood risk management with special focus on retention reservoirs
ID Bezak, Nejc (Avtor), ID Kovačević, Martina (Avtor), ID Johnen, Gregor (Avtor), ID Lebar, Klaudija (Avtor), ID Zupanc, Vesna (Avtor), ID Vidmar, Andrej (Avtor), ID Rusjan, Simon (Avtor)

URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10099 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Floods are among the most frequent and deadliest natural disasters, and the magnitude and frequency of floods is expected to increase. Therefore, the effects of different flood risk management options need to be evaluated. In this study, afforestation, permeable concrete implementation, and the use of dry and wet retention reservoirs were tested as possible options for urban flood risk reduction in a case study involving the Glinščica river catchment (Slovenia). Additionally, the effect of dry and wet reservoirs was investigated at a larger (catchment) scale. Results showed that in the case of afforestation and permeable concrete, large areas are required to achieve notable peak discharge reduction (from a catchment scale point of view). The costs related to the implementation of such measures could be relatively high, and may become even higher than the potential benefits related to the multifunctionality and multi-purpose opportunities of such measures. On the other hand, dry and wet retention reservoirs could provide more significant peak discharge reductions; if appropriate locations are available, such reservoirs could be implemented at acceptable costs for decision makers. However, the results of this study show that reservoir effects quickly reduce with scale. This means that while these measures can have significant local effects, they may have only a minor impact at larger scales. We found that this was also the case for the afforestation and permeable concrete

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:floods / afforestation / green measures / retention reservoirs / hydrological modelling / flood damage model / hydraulic modelling / permeable concrete
Vrsta gradiva:Znanstveno delo (r2)
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FGG - Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo
Leto izida:2021
Status objave pri reviji:Objavljeno
Verzija članka:Založnikova različica članka
Poslano v recenzijo:13.08.2021
Datum sprejetja članka:07.09.2021
Datum objave:09.09.2021
Št. strani:[20] str.
Številčenje:Letn. 13, št. 18, 10099
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-131846 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:556.1:004
ISSN pri članku:2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su131810099 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:75998467 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:04.10.2021
Število ogledov:287
Število prenosov:23
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:AddThis
AddThis uporablja piškotke, za katere potrebujemo vaše privoljenje.
Uredi privoljenje...

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Sustainability
Skrajšan naslov:Sustainability
Založnik:MDPI
ISSN:2071-1050
COBISS.SI-ID:5324897 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.
Začetek licenciranja:09.09.2021

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:poplave / pogozdovanje / zeleni ukrepi / zadrževalniki / hidrološko modeliranje / škodni model / hidravlično modeliranje / drenažni beton

Projekti

Financer:EC - European Commission
Številka projekta:CA16209
Akronim:COST Land4Flood

Financer:ARRS - Agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:P2-0180
Naslov:Vodarstvo in geotehnika: orodja in metode za analize in simulacije procesov ter razvoj tehnologij.

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj