izpis_h1_title_alt

Testing the performance of multi-frequency low-cost GNSS receivers and antennas
ID Hamza, Veton (Avtor), ID Stopar, Bojan (Avtor), ID Sterle, Oskar (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (3,62 MB)
MD5: 6D2B0EB3D8FF92D8E3225BA99C0BE7BA
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/2029 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) low-cost multi-frequency receivers are argued as an alternative to geodetic receivers for many applications. Calibrated low-cost antennas recently became available on the market making low-cost instruments more comparable with geodetic ones. The main goal of this research was to evaluate the noise of low-cost GNSS receivers, to compare the positioning quality from different types of low-cost antennas, and to analyze the positioning differences between low-cost and geodetic instruments. The results from a zero baseline test indicated that the u-blox multi-frequency receiver, namely, ZED-F9P, had low noise that was at the sub-millimeter level. To analyze the impact of the antennas in the obtained coordinates, a short baseline test was applied. Both tested uncalibrated antennas (Tallysman TW3882 and Survey) demonstrated satisfactory positioning performance. The Tallysman antenna was more accurate in the horizontal position determination, and the difference from the true value was only 0.1 mm; while, for the Survey antenna, the difference was 1.0 mm. For the ellipsoid height, the differences were 0.3 and 0.6 mm for the Survey and Tallysman antennas, respectively. The comparison of low-cost receivers with calibrated low-cost antennas (Survey Calibrated) and geodetic instruments proved better performance for the latter. The geodetic GNSS instruments were more accurate than the low-cost instruments, and the precision of the estimated coordinates from the geodetic network was also greater. Low-cost GNSS instruments were not at the same level as the geodetic ones; however, considering their cost, they demonstrated excellent performance that is sufficiently appropriate for various geodetic applications.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:GNSS, low-cost instruments, geodetic instruments, comparison, sessions
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FGG - Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2021
Št. strani:16 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 21, iss. 6, art. 2029
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-127409 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:528(497.4)
ISSN pri članku:1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s21062029 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:55332867 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:04.06.2021
Število ogledov:728
Število prenosov:133
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Sensors
Skrajšan naslov:Sensors
Založnik:MDPI
ISSN:1424-8220
COBISS.SI-ID:10176278 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.
Začetek licenciranja:12.03.2021

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:GNSS, geodetski instrumenti, ekonomski vidik, primerjava

Projekti

Financer:ARRS - Agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:P2-0227
Naslov:Geoinformacijska infrastruktura in trajnostni prostorski razvoj Slovenije

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj