izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava cenovno ugodnih alternativnih programov za obdelavo rastrskih slik
Pečoler, Andrej (Avtor), Lazar, Mihael (Mentor) Več o mentorju... Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (5,62 MB)

Izvleček
V tej nalogi se s Photoshopom primerjajo trije cenovno ugodni programi za obdelavo rastrskih slik – Gimp, Photopea in Fotor. Namen diplomskega dela je primerjava alternativ skozi izdelek, postopke, hitrost dela, funkcionalnost orodij, ažurnost novih verzij in kompromise pri uporabi posameznega programa glede na delo s programom Photoshop. V teoretičnem delu smo najprej raziskali zgodovino rastrske grafike – definicijo, razlog za nastanek, začetke in obstoj. Nato smo našteli in opisali osnovne rastrske formate (JPG, PSD, TIFF, PNG, GIF, RAW) ter opisali Photoshop in njegove različice. Primerjava v praktičnem delu zajema funkcije, ki se pričakujejo od zmogljivejših programov za urejanje rastrskih slik, kot so določanje barvnih profilov, delo v oblaku, avtomatski popravki barv, prilagoditve, HDR, popravki popačenja leče, popravki učinka rdečih oči, izbira in delo s plastmi, delo s kanali in maskami, vektorji, knjižnice tekstur, slogi pisav in čopičev, geometrijske transformacije, vodila, animacija in 3D. Pri vsaki funkciji smo predstavili potek dela in prikazali rezultate. Na koncu smo prišli do zaključka, da ima vsak program svoje prednosti in pomanjkljivosti, izbira pa je odvisna od: namena uporabe, hitrosti dela, cene, nabora funkcij in njihove funkcionalnosti, zasedenosti pomnilnika, preglednosti delovnega okolja in združljivosti z operacijskimi sistemi. Photoshop je primerna izbira za profesionalne uporabnike, katerim cena ne predstavlja ovire in si želijo širok nabor kakovostnih funkcij. Brezplačna Gimp in Photopea sta primerna izbira za uporabnike, ki želijo urejati slike z večino profesionalnih funkcij, ki jih ponuja Photoshop (tudi v profesionalne namene). Delno brezplačni Fotor je namenjen nezahtevnim uporabnikom za hitro in enostavno urejanje slik z osnovnimi ali nekaterimi naprednejšimi funkcijami, ki imajo določene omejitve.

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:Photoshop, Gimp, Photopea, Fotor, primerjava programov.
Vrsta gradiva:Diplomsko delo/naloga (mb11)
Organizacija:NTF - Naravoslovnotehniška fakulteta
Leto izida:2020
Število ogledov:47
Število prenosov:18
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Skupna ocena:(0 glasov)
Vaša ocena:Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom.
:
Objavi na:AddThis
AddThis uporablja piškotke, za katere potrebujemo vaše privoljenje.
Uredi privoljenje...

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Naslov:Comparison of affordable alternative programs for raster image editing
Izvleček:
In the following diploma thesis, we have compared Photoshop with three cost-effective raster image processing programs - Gimp, Photopea and Fotor. The purpose of the thesis was to compare alternatives regarding the product, procedures, speed of work, functionality of tools, updates of new versions and compromises in the use of each program compared to working with Photoshop. In the theoretical part, we first explored the history of raster graphics - the definition, its beginnings and the reason for its emergence and existence. We then listed and described the basic raster formats (JPG, PSD, TIFF, PNG, GIF, RAW) and described Photoshop and its versions. The comparison in the practical part includes features that are mostly expected from more powerful raster image editing programs, such as colour profile determination, working in the cloud, auto colour corrections, adjustments, HDR, lens distortion correction, red-eye correction, selections and work with layers, working with channels and masks, vectors, texture libraries, font and brush styles, geometric transformations, guides, animation and 3D. We introduced the workflow and presented the results for each of the functions. In the final part, we concluded that each program has its advantages as well as drawbacks, and the choice depends on the following factors: purpose of use, speed of work, price, set of features and their functionality, computer storage capacity, layout and clarity of the working environment and compatibility with operating systems. Photoshop is a fitting choice for professional users who do not mind the cost and want to work with a wide range of quality features. Gimp and Photopea are suitable alternatives for users who want to edit images with most of the professional features Photoshop provides (also for professional purposes), but free of charge. Fotor, with its free trial version, can be recommended for non-demanding users who want fast and easy editing of images with basic or some more advanced features that have certain limitations.

Ključne besede:Photoshop, Gimp, Fotor, Photopea, comparison of software.

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Komentarji

Dodaj komentar

Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti.

Komentarji (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
Ni komentarjev!

Nazaj