izpis_h1_title_alt

Meta-analyses in survey methodology : a systematic review
ID Čehovin, Gregor (Avtor), ID Bošnjak, Michael (Avtor), ID Lozar Manfreda, Katja (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (576,85 KB)
MD5: ABD46AAD38BE19C46D598F9545CC3E7C
.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (276,87 KB)
MD5: 7E797688B974BD898E57FFCE6492FCB0

Izvleček
Meta-analytic techniques have become the standard methods for aggregating the results from thematically related studies in the behavioral, health, and economic sciences. To analyze the state of the art of using meta-analyses in survey methodology, previous meta-analyses are systematically identified and classified according to the thematic areas the analyses address. This is followed by identifying gaps in research (i.e., areas where there are few or no existing meta-analyses) and investigating potential avenues for future meta-analyses in this field. The findings are based on a systematic search of two bibliographic harvesters (together covering 265 bibliographic databases), which yielded 54 eligible manuscripts reporting 60 meta-analytic studies and 91 effect sizes. To identify the thematic areas, the effect sizes are structured according to seven categories of the total survey error (TSE). Characteristics of primary studies that potentially influence the variability of meta-analytic findings also are considered, such as the survey mode, questionnaire design, and sample characteristics. The results show that the thematic areas of these meta-analyses cover only two of the seven TSE categories: measurement and nonresponse error. Thematic areas in the remaining TSE categories are not covered, and the key practical implication is that gaps exist in current research. Regarding the methodology of existing meta-analyses in the survey methodology field, there are fundamental differences in reporting styles in terms of transparency and replicability, calling for a concerted effort to develop meta-analytic reporting standards for survey methodology.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FDV - Fakulteta za družbene vede
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Recenzirani rokopis
Leto izida:2018
Št. strani:Str. 641-660
Številčenje:Vol. 82, no. 4
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-116169 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:303
ISSN pri članku:0033-362X
DOI:10.1093/poq/nfy042 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:35940445 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:20.05.2020
Število ogledov:1355
Število prenosov:861
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Public opinion quarterly
Skrajšan naslov:Public opin. q.
Založnik:Oxford University Press
ISSN:0033-362X
COBISS.SI-ID:26215936 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj