In the diploma thesis, we created 360-degree panoramic photographs and interactive virtual space of the restaurant Kavarna Central. We compared and evaluated two ways of production - using free and using payable platforms. In the theoretical part, we presented virtual reality, panoramic photography, panoramic forms and projections, interactive photos and interactive panorama procedures. In the experimental work, the Canon EOS 600D camera was used to make a series of 360-degree photos of the interior on the tripod. We photographed each view three times with different light exposure values for later HDR editing (High Dynamic Range). Among the free platforms, we used Picturenaut 3 for HDR photo editing, Microsoft Image Composite Editor for photo stitching, GIMP for fixing offsets and VTC-Virtual Tours Creator for posting online and for implementing hot spots. In paid mode, we used trial versions of Adobe CC Lightroom for HDR editing, PTGui Pro 11.15 for stitching, Adobe CC Photoshop for retouching and Pano2VR Pro 6.0.5 for hotspot connections and making of the html file for further publising. We have successfully created an interactive virtual space in both ways. We estimate that they are equivalent in appearance and quality. A product overview is better in paying mode, as it provides some additional options and commands. From a financial point of view, it is most advantageous to use free platforms. We also found that it would be more cost-effective to order the production of IPF by providers than to build it alone using payable platforms. Also, from a time perspective, the use of free programs has proven to be more favorable compared to paid platforms. For an experienced user, such production is equally time-consuming or even shorter than if the product were ordered from commercial providers.
|
