Public administration is a system of executive power with its services, which cooperate in shaping of politics and directly execute the approved political decisions. The key functions of the public administration are passing the regulatory provisions and individual service decrees, which importantly influence people's lives. The Constitutional Court has a very important role for that because it ensures constitutionality and legality of regulations, respecting of human rights and fundamental privileges as the state's highest authority with constitutional and legal judgement. The first is guarded with constitutional and legal regulations judgement, the second with constitutional appeal, which we name also as judicial control of the Constitutional Court over the civil service and legal regulations. This is the most important jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court, which also has a lot of other responsibilities that additionally incriminate its work, therefore there have appeared some serious hesitations about rationality of administrative regulations constitutional review in front of the Constitutional court because of its increasing burden.
The theoretic-descriptive method and interpretation of the literature have been mostly used in the master's thesis. Opinions of different authors have been summarized and compared.
The researched topic contributes and refreshes the issues of how to relieve the Constitutional Court. It researches the last period and it presents the position of the Constitutional Court because of the too wide jurisdiction. The study involves the international comparison between Croatia and France, which have different practice for the topic. However, the practice could also be applied for Slovenia.
The key findings show that the number of unsolved cases at the Constitutional Court has been increasing in the last years, which makes its work even harder. Because of too wide jurisdiction, its relief is needed, which can be done based on Croatian and French practice in the modified version.
|
