izpis_h1_title_alt

Posredni storilec pri kaznivem dejanju
ID Maver, Marija (Author), ID Jakulin, Vid (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (911,78 KB)
MD5: EC643891A973B2922330E56BFA524808
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/264deb1b-6cad-4c20-bdf0-3fc0d5cbf6f9

Abstract
Posredno storilstvo je eden najnovejših uzakonjenih institutov s področja kazenskega prava. Od leta 2008 je v Kazenskem zakoniku (KZ-1) opredeljen kot oblika storilca, ki izvrši kaznivo dejanje z izrabljanjem in vodenjem drugega. Sodna praksa in teorija sta posredno storilstvo uporabljali že prej, vendar ne izrecno. Uporaba ni bila sporna, čeprav so nekateri teoretiki nasprotovali posrednemu storilstvu, ker da v sistemu limitirane akcesornosti udeležbe, kot je naš, to ni potrebno. V teoriji je utemeljeno na teoriji o oblasti nad dejanjem. Posredni storilec tipično z zmoto ali prisilo neposrednega storilca izrabi za izvršitev kaznivega dejanja. On je tisti, ki vse organizira in vodi, ima pregled in oblast nad celotnim dejanjem, le neposredno izvršitev prepusti neposrednemu storilcu. Konstrukcija posrednega storilstva je primerna tudi za t. i. organiziran aparat moči, čeprav so v tem primeru neposredni storilci povsem kazensko odgovorni.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:posredno storilstvo, teorija oblasti nad dejanjem, limitirana akcesornost udeležbe, napeljevanje, organizirani aparat moči
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-99015 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:15988049 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.12.2017
Views:2906
Downloads:1255
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Indirect perpetrator in a criminal offense
Abstract:
Indirect perpetration is one of the most recent law-enforcement institutes in the field of criminal law. It was introduced into Slovenian law system in 2008. In Criminal Code, it is defined as a form of perpetrator committing a criminal offense through the exploitation and management of the another. Indirect perpetration was used in case law and in theory before, but not explicitly. The use was not controversial, although some theorists opposed to it, because in the system of limited accessibility of participation, such as our own, it is not necessary. Indirect perpetration is based on the control-theory of perpetration. The indirect perpetrator typically uses the direct perpetrator for the commission of a crime by mistake or coercion. He is the one who organizes and conducts everything, has an overview and authority over the entire act, but only direct enforcement is left to the direct perpetrator. The construction of the indirect perpetration is also suitable for so-called organized power structures, despite the fact that in this case the direct perpetrators are entirely criminal liable.

Keywords:indirect perpetration, the control-theory of perpetration, limited accessibility of participation, theory of innocent agency, instigation, organised power structures

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back