Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Posredni storilec pri kaznivem dejanju
ID
Maver, Marija
(
Author
),
ID
Jakulin, Vid
(
Mentor
)
More about this mentor...
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(911,78 KB)
MD5: EC643891A973B2922330E56BFA524808
PID:
20.500.12556/rul/264deb1b-6cad-4c20-bdf0-3fc0d5cbf6f9
Image galllery
Abstract
Posredno storilstvo je eden najnovejših uzakonjenih institutov s področja kazenskega prava. Od leta 2008 je v Kazenskem zakoniku (KZ-1) opredeljen kot oblika storilca, ki izvrši kaznivo dejanje z izrabljanjem in vodenjem drugega. Sodna praksa in teorija sta posredno storilstvo uporabljali že prej, vendar ne izrecno. Uporaba ni bila sporna, čeprav so nekateri teoretiki nasprotovali posrednemu storilstvu, ker da v sistemu limitirane akcesornosti udeležbe, kot je naš, to ni potrebno. V teoriji je utemeljeno na teoriji o oblasti nad dejanjem. Posredni storilec tipično z zmoto ali prisilo neposrednega storilca izrabi za izvršitev kaznivega dejanja. On je tisti, ki vse organizira in vodi, ima pregled in oblast nad celotnim dejanjem, le neposredno izvršitev prepusti neposrednemu storilcu. Konstrukcija posrednega storilstva je primerna tudi za t. i. organiziran aparat moči, čeprav so v tem primeru neposredni storilci povsem kazensko odgovorni.
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
posredno storilstvo
,
teorija oblasti nad dejanjem
,
limitirana akcesornost udeležbe
,
napeljevanje
,
organizirani aparat moči
Work type:
Master's thesis/paper
Organization:
PF - Faculty of Law
Year:
2017
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-99015
COBISS.SI-ID:
15988049
Publication date in RUL:
21.12.2017
Views:
3741
Downloads:
1312
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
MAVER, Marija, 2017,
Posredni storilec pri kaznivem dejanju
[online]. Master’s thesis. [Accessed 14 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=99015
Copy citation
Share:
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
Indirect perpetrator in a criminal offense
Abstract:
Indirect perpetration is one of the most recent law-enforcement institutes in the field of criminal law. It was introduced into Slovenian law system in 2008. In Criminal Code, it is defined as a form of perpetrator committing a criminal offense through the exploitation and management of the another. Indirect perpetration was used in case law and in theory before, but not explicitly. The use was not controversial, although some theorists opposed to it, because in the system of limited accessibility of participation, such as our own, it is not necessary. Indirect perpetration is based on the control-theory of perpetration. The indirect perpetrator typically uses the direct perpetrator for the commission of a crime by mistake or coercion. He is the one who organizes and conducts everything, has an overview and authority over the entire act, but only direct enforcement is left to the direct perpetrator. The construction of the indirect perpetration is also suitable for so-called organized power structures, despite the fact that in this case the direct perpetrators are entirely criminal liable.
Keywords:
indirect perpetration
,
the control-theory of perpetration
,
limited accessibility of participation
,
theory of innocent agency
,
instigation
,
organised power structures
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Searching for similar works...
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back