Meta-analiza zanesljivosti anketnega merjenja socialne opore v popolnih omrežjih

Hlebec, Valentina (author)

V prispevku so predstavljeni rezultati meta analize desetih eksperimentov, ki so bili zasnovani z namenom, da bi ocenili zanesljivost anketnih merskih instrumentov za merjenje izmenjave socialne opore v popolnih omrežjih. V eksperimentani načrt je vključenih več spremenljivk, in sicer: pet merskih lestvic (binarna lestvica, dve 5 - stopenjski ordinalni lestvici, 11 - stopenjska ordinalna lestvica in ocenjevanje z dolžino črte), dve metodi anketnega zbiranja podatkov (odgovarjanje po spominu in prepoznavanje), dva tipa anketnih vprašanj o izmenjavi socialne opore (originalni in recipročni) in značilnost dopolnjenega MTMM pristopa za ocenjevanje zanesljivosti (časovni interval med ponovljenimi merjenji). Zanesljivost je ocenjena s pomočjo dopolnjenega MTMM pristopa. Meta analiza je narejena s pomočjo multiple klasifikacijske analize. Rezultati kažejo, da sta najmanj zanesljivi binarna lestvica in merski instrument, ki je predstavljen prvič. Metodi anketnega zbiranja podatkov o popolnih omrežijh, odgovarjanje po spominu in prepoznavanje dasta enako zanesljive podatke. Tudi obe vrsti izmenjave socialne opore (originalna in recipročna) sta izmerjeni enako zanesljivo.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: zanesljivost, dopolnjen MTMM pristop, socialna opora, meta analiza, multipla klasifikacijska analiza, odločanje, merske lestvice
• Work type: Not categorized
• Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
• Organization: FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
• Year: 2001
• Number of pages: Str. 63-76
• Numbering: Letn. 38, št. 1
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-7053
• UDC: 303.682
• ISSN on article: 0040-3598
• COBISS.SI-ID: 23411205
• Publication date in RUL: 11.07.2014

Record is a part of a journal

• Title: Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
• Shortened title: Teor. praksa
• Publisher: Fakulteta za družbene vede
• ISSN: 0040-3598
• COBISS.SI-ID: 763652

Secondary language

• Language: Unknown

Abstract

The paper evaluates the reliability of network measurement instruments for measuring social support exchange in complete networks. The author presents and discusses the results from ten experiments, designed for analysing the reliability of five measurement scales: (1) binary, (2) 5-point categorical, (3) 5-point categorical with labels (4) line production, and (5) 11-point categorical scale as well as two measurement methods for listing alters (free recall and recognition), type of network question (original, reciprocated), and characteristics of MTMM design (time between instrument presentations). Reliability was estimated by the true score multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) approach. Meta-analyses of factors affecting the reliability and the validity of network measurement, done by Multiple Classification Analysis, show the binary scale and the first presentation of measurement instruments as the least reliable. Surprisingly, the two data collection methods (free recall and recognition) and the two types of network questions (original, reciprocated) yield equally reliable data.