Details

Confucian equality reconsidered : democracy, meritocracy, and hierarchy in Chenyang Li’s Reshaping Confucianism
ID Lee, Ahyoung (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (605,16 KB)
MD5: 413FD9887D3BA7C337AA77969DB55A62
URLURL - Source URL, Visit http://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/24440 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
In Reshaping Confucianism: A Progressive Inquiry, Li contends that Confucianism con­tains valuable resources for a progressive conception of equality—proportional equal­ity based on individual merit and moral desert. While acknowledging Li’s innovative attempt to reconcile Confucian hierarchy with democratic principles, this paper raises crucial questions regarding its interpretive validity, conceptual clarity, and theoretical consistency. First, Li’s central thesis relies on a reading of early Confucianism that over­states its egalitarian dimension. Second, in presenting proportional equality as compati­ble with democracy, Li collapses crucial distinctions between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome, resulting in a misplaced criticism of modern egalitarianism. Third, his simultaneous endorsement of universal suffrage and Confucian meritocracy exposes unresolved tensions in his theory between democratic inclusivity and hierarchical elitism. Nevertheless, Li’s work offers a significant contribution by bridging Confucian traditions with contemporary egalitarian discourse and invites renewed reflection on how classical philosophies can inform modern debates on justice, dignity, and political participation.

Language:English
Keywords:equality, egalitarianism, Confucianism, political rights, political meritocracy
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2026
Number of pages:Str. 221-232
Numbering:Vol. 14, no. 3
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-190613 This link opens in a new window
ISSN on article:2232-5131
DOI:10.4312/as.2026.14.3.221-232 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:05.11.2026
Views:88
Downloads:14
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Asian studies = Azijske študije
Publisher:Založba Univerze v Ljubljani
ISSN:2232-5131
COBISS.SI-ID:265206272 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Ponovni razmislek o enakosti v konfucijanstvu : demokracija, meritokracija in hierarhija v Li Chenyangovem delu Reshaping Confucianism
Abstract:
V delu Reshaping Confucianism: A Progressive Inquiry (Preoblikovanje konfucijanstva: progresivna analiza) Li Chengyang trdi, da konfucijanstvo vsebuje dragocene vire za progresivno pojmovanje enakosti, to je sorazmerno enakost, ki temelji na individualnih zaslugah in moralni upravičenosti. Čeprav priznavam Lijev inovativni poskus uskladitve konfucijanske hierarhije z demokratičnimi načeli, ta članek postavlja ključna vprašanja o njegovi interpretativni veljavnosti, konceptualni jasnosti in teoretski doslednosti. Prvič, Lijeva osrednja teza temelji na branju zgodnjega konfucijanstva, ki precenjuje njegove egalitarne razsežnosti. Drugič, s tem ko sorazmerno enakost predstavlja kot združljivo z demokracijo, Li zabriše ključne razlike med enakostjo možnosti in enakostjo izidov, kar vodi v zgrešeno kritiko sodobnega egalitarizma. Tretjič, njegovo hkratno zagovarjan­je splošne volilne pravice in konfucijanske meritokracije razkriva nerešene napetosti v njegovi teoriji med demokratično vključenostjo in hierarhičnim elitizmom. Kljub temu Lijevo delo predstavlja pomemben prispevek, saj premošča konfucijanske tradicije in sodobni diskurz o egalitarnosti ter spodbuja k ponovnemu premisleku o tem, kako lah­ko klasične filozofije osvetlijo sodobne razprave o pravičnosti, dostojanstvu in politični participaciji.

Keywords:enakost, egalitarizem, konfucijanstvo, politične pravice, politična meritokracija

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Asian studies

Back