Details

Off-centre AI : on alignment, antihumanism and AI ethics
ID Fazi, M. Beatrice (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (751,43 KB)
MD5: B06DB68B6F3B01F081A88406D031CFA3
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://journals.uni-lj.si/arshumanitas/article/view/28664 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
This article examines the legacies of antihumanism within the context of artificial in-telligence (AI) research. In response to the ethical risks inherent to the proliferation of quasi-autonomous computational agents, the AI industry, legislative bodies and academia often advocate for a “human-centred” approach that would align AI with human values, desires and goals, ostensibly to make these technologies more transpar-ent and trustworthy. The rhetoric of human-centred AI reveals many of the conceptual limitations that antihumanism had already identified in the foundationalist and sub-jectivist assumptions of Western philosophy. This article considers some of these chal-lenging limitations while also problematizing antihumanism itself. Through Derrida’s notion of “centre” and an analysis of alignment methodologies, the article demon-strates how attempts to decentre the human often reconstitute new forms of authority. It then examines the possibility of surpassing standard anthropocentric approaches in AI while maintaining a critical philosophical engagement with the structurally neces-sary yet precarious character of organizing principles.

Language:English
Keywords:artificial inteligence, ethics, alignment, anthropocentrism, decentring, human-centred artificial inteligence, theoretical antihumanism
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:10.07.2026
Year:2026
Number of pages:Str. 127-140
Numbering:Letn. 20, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-185002 This link opens in a new window
UDC:316.74:004.8
ISSN on article:1854-9632
DOI:10.4312/ars.20.1.127-140 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:285308419 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.07.2026
Views:144
Downloads:89
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Ars & humanitas : revija za umetnost in humanistiko
Publisher:Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Založba Univerze v Ljubljani
ISSN:1854-9632
COBISS.SI-ID:233246720 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Abstract:
Ta članek preučuje dediščine antihumanizma v kontekstu raziskovanja umetne inte-ligence (UI). Kot odgovor na etična tveganja, povezana s širjenjem kvaziavtonomnih računalniških agentov, se industrija UI, zakonodajna telesa in akademski svet pogosto zavzemajo za »na človeka osredotočen« pristop, ki bi UI uskladil s človeškimi vredno-tami, željami in cilji, domnevno zato, da bi te tehnologije postale bolj pregledne in za-upanja vredne. Retorika o UI, osredotočeni na človeka, razkriva številne konceptualne omejitve, ki jih je antihumanizem že opredelil v esencialističnih in subjektivističnih predpostavkah zahodne filozofije. Ta članek obravnava nekatere od teh kočljivih ome-jitev, hkrati pa problematizira sam antihumanizem. Z Derridajevim pojmom »sredi-šča« in analizo metodologij usklajevanja članek prikazuje, kako poskusi decentriranja človeka pogosto vzpostavijo nove oblike avtoritete. Nato preučuje možnost preseganja standardnih antropocentričnih pristopov v UI, hkrati pa ohranja kritično filozofsko soočenost s strukturno nujnim, vendar negotovim značajem organizacijskih načel.

Keywords:etika, umetna inteligenca, usklajenost, antropocentrizem, decentriranje, osredotočena umetna inteligenca, človek, teoretični antihumanizem

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Ars & humanitas

Back