Details

European forestry systems mirror social-ecological diversity but closer-to-nature forest management and landscape planning are also required
ID Angelstam, Per (Author), ID Manton, Michael (Author), ID Nagel, Thomas Andrew (Author), ID Sotirov, Metodi (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,74 MB)
MD5: EE0FBAB53A0546B9551F15F20E2DE7AD
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-36659-z This link opens in a new window

Abstract
New forest-related policies lead to conflicts among different forest benefits, actors and stakeholders. This requires multiple tools for forest management and landscape planning towards multifunctional landscapes. We first explore if the relative proportions of clearcutting (CC) and continuous cover forestry (CCF) as the two major contrasting traditional forest management systems in Europe can be explained by the complex net effect of biophysical, anthropogenic and social system variables. We then review mismatches between CC and CCF methods, and the tools required by new policies advocating multifunctional forest landscapes. The first three components of a multivariate analysis (PCA) explained 66% of the variation in the dataset. There were four main clusters of countries: (1) Nordic-Baltic boreal, (2) continental temperate lowland, (3) mountain, and (4) southern and southeastern Europe. The incidence of CCF in the 26 countries was correlated to both PC1 and PC2, and a multiple regression explained 53% of the variation in applying CCF. However, key mismatches between the application of CC and CCF and policy about multifunctional landscapes include difficulties to secure biodiversity conservation and ecosystem resilience. Therefore, new “closer-to-nature” forest management systems and triad landscape planning are also necessary.

Language:English
Keywords:sustainable forest management, closer-to-nature forest management, multifunctional landscape, segregation and integration, triad, spatial planning
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2026
Number of pages:19 str.
Numbering:Vol. 16, art. 6370
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-179035 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*61:630*90(4)
ISSN on article:2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-026-36659-z This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:267064067 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:23.02.2026
Views:182
Downloads:58
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Scientific reports
Shortened title:Sci. rep.
Publisher:Nature Publishing Group
ISSN:2045-2322
COBISS.SI-ID:18727432 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:trajnostno gospodarjenje z gozdovi, gospodarjenje z gozdovi bližje naravi, večnamenska krajina, segregacija in integracija, prostorsko načrtovanje

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back