Vaš brskalnik ne omogoča JavaScript!
JavaScript je nujen za pravilno delovanje teh spletnih strani. Omogočite JavaScript ali pa uporabite sodobnejši brskalnik.
Repozitorij Univerze v Ljubljani
Nacionalni portal odprte znanosti
Odprta znanost
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Iskanje
Napredno
Novo v RUL
Kaj je RUL
V številkah
Pomoč
Prijava
Podrobno
What kind of pluralism do we need in economics?
ID
Kešeljević, Aleksandar
(
Avtor
)
PDF - Predstavitvena datoteka,
prenos
(175,78 KB)
MD5: D2E862BE8DEE29CD19E6C2AA52CA34EC
URL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite
https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/intellectual-economics/article/view/7539
Galerija slik
Izvleček
Purpose. This article highlights the notion that methodological normativism of the neoclassical school has consolidated its monopoly position within economics, and significantly reduces our social reality by understanding the economic system as a closed system. The author aims to show that such a misleading picture of the world leads to one single best epistemology, theory, methodology and educational system within economics. Design/Methodology/Approach. The author explains complaints against such an approach in terms of five different kinds of interrelated and interdependent pluralisms. The comparative and documentary methods ensure maximum openness with regard to the collection of theoretical and empirical papers. The qualitative analysis of “pro et contra” debate is based on a questionnaire completed by students. Findings. The author believes that understanding different types of pluralism and their interconnectedness is the most appropriate approach to inquiry and teaching in economics. Epistemological pluralism logically follows from ontological by allowing a relatively separate system of paradigms to co-exist as a necessary counterpart to the plurality of the social world. In debates, the author strives for a limited range of complementary theoreti- cal approaches with meaningful methodological standards in order for students to obtain a more anthropocentric and less dogmatic view of the world. Originality. There have been few attempts to show deeper interdependence among various types of pluralism. The current study addresses this gap in the literature. The testimonials of students show the usefulness of “pro et contra” debate in introducing and promoting more pluralism into the educational process.
Jezik:
Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:
methodological normativism
,
pluralism
,
debate
Vrsta gradiva:
Članek v reviji
Tipologija:
1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:
EF - Ekonomska fakulteta
Status publikacije:
Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:
Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:
2023
Št. strani:
Str. 240-259
Številčenje:
Vol. 17, no. 2
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-167419
UDK:
33
ISSN pri članku:
1822-8038
DOI:
10.13165/IE-23-17-2-01
COBISS.SI-ID:
179251715
Datum objave v RUL:
20.02.2025
Število ogledov:
636
Število prenosov:
167
Metapodatki:
Citiraj gradivo
Navadno besedilo
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:
Gradivo je del revije
Naslov:
Intelektine ekonomika
Skrajšan naslov:
Intelekt. ekon.
Založnik:
Mykolas Romeris University
ISSN:
1822-8038
COBISS.SI-ID:
519536665
Licence
Licenca:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:
Najbolj omejujoča licenca Creative Commons. Uporabniki lahko prenesejo in delijo delo v nekomercialne namene in ga ne smejo uporabiti za nobene druge namene.
Sekundarni jezik
Jezik:
Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:
ekonomija
,
pluralizem
,
methodology
Podobna dela
Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:
Nazaj