Details

Mimesis in umetnost v času nevromorfnih tehnologij
ID Berlot Pompe, Uršula (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (226,64 KB)
MD5: 6E482972AACB0392AA81D4A08E07F9B9
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://ebooks.uni-lj.si/ZalozbaUL/catalog/book/692 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Sodobna odkritja v razvoju umetne inteligence se interdisciplinarno povezujejo z odkritji v nevroznanosti, kibernetiki in biomimetiki. Temeljna tendenca pri raziskovanju inteligentnih strojev temelji na posnemanju možganskih procesov; gre torej za posebno obliko mimetičnih postopkov, kjer tehnološko posnema organsko, torej naravno. Odkritje nevromorfnih tehnologij (sinaptičnih čipov in umetnih nevronov) je kibernetičnim možganom omogočilo visoko stopnjo plastičnosti, torej prilagodljivosti in odzivnosti na hitre spremembe vnesenih podatkov ter njihovo obdelavo, ki je bližje organizmu kot mehanizmu. Ločevanje med umetnim in naravnim, ki je še pred desetletjem temeljilo na izpostavljanju razlik med umetnimi sistemi, ki jih poganja programirana koda (determinizem), in živimi, čutečimi organizmi, ki so epigenetsko odzivni na okolje, postaja vse bolj obsoletno. V humanističnih znanostih, filozofiji, estetiki in umetnosti se porajajo miselne tendence, ki poskušajo razumeti širši pomen integracije pametnih strojev v procesih komunikacije, ustvarjalnosti in imaginacije na ravni družbe ali posameznika, saj uporaba umetne inteligence sproža vidne spremembe mentalnih procesov individuacije, kognicije, pomnjenja, razmišljanja in doživljanja. Prispevek se opira na izbrane filozofske premise o tehnološkem (Malabou, Stiegler) ter razmišlja o vidikih nove tehnološke mimetičnosti v razmerju do tradicionalnih pojmov pasivnega mimesisa in imitacije, razlik med kopijo in originalom, modelom in simulacijo. Koncept mimesisa v luči sodobnih nevroznanstvenih konceptov možganske plastičnosti in zrcalnih nevronov (fiziološke podlage posnemanja, empatije in sočutja) z aplikacijami v domeni kibernetike in nevrotehnologij pridobiva nove pomene, saj poraja vprašanja o vlogi posnemanja, imaginacije in ustvarjalnosti v procesih konstitucije zavesti in sebstva tudi pri inteligentnih strojih.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:nevroznanost, nevromorfne tehnologije, mimesis, posnemanje, umetna inteligenca
Typology:1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:ALUO - Academy of Fine Arts and Design
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2024
Number of pages:Str. 61-72, 240-241
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-166636 This link opens in a new window
UDC:7.01
DOI:10.51938/9789612974633 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:220247811 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.01.2025
Views:324
Downloads:117
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:Vizualnost v času posthumanizma : okoljska etika, ekofeminizem, kibernetika in digitalna humanistika v umetnosti in oblikovanju
Editors:Uršula Berlot Pompe
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:Založba Univerze
Year:2024
ISBN:978-961-297-464-0
COBISS.SI-ID:215497731 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Mimesis and art in the age of aeuromorphic technologies
Abstract:
Modern advances in the development of artificial intelligence are interdisciplinary with discoveries in neuroscience, cybernetics and biomimetics. The basic tendency in intelligent machine research is to mimic brain processes; it is therefore a special form of mimetic process, where the technological mimics the organic, i.e. the natural. The discovery of neuromorphic technologies (synaptic chips and artificial neurons) has enabled the cybernetic brain to have a high degree of plasticity, i.e. adaptability and responsiveness to rapid changes in the input of data, and to process it in a way that is closer to an organism than a mechanism. The distinction between the artificial and the natural, which a decade ago was based on highlighting the differences between artificial systems driven by programmed code (determinism) and living, sentient organisms that are epigenetically responsive to their environment, is becoming increasingly obsolete. There are emerging trends of thought in the humanities, philosophy, aesthetics and the arts that seek to understand the broader significance of the integration of intelligent machines in the processes of communication, creativity and imagination at the level of society or the individual, since the use of artificial intelligence triggers visible changes in the mental processes of individualisation, cognition, memory, thinking and experience. The paper draws on selected philosophical premises on the technological (Malabou, Stiegler) and reflects on aspects of the new technological mimetic in relation to traditional notions of passive mimesis and imitation, the differences between copy and original, model and simulation. The concept of mimesis, in the light of contemporary neuroscientific concepts of brain plasticity and mirror neurons (the physiological basis of imitation, empathy and compassion), is acquiring new meanings with applications in the domain of cybernetics and neurotechnologies, as it raises questions about the role of imitation, imagination and creativity in the processes of the constitution of consciousness and the self, even in intelligent machines.

Keywords:neuroscience, neuromorphic technologies, mimesis, imitation, artificial intelligence

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back