Introduction: Pelvic radiography is one of the most commonly used examinations in general radiography and is one of the most dose-intensive examinations. Due to the increasing problems of overweight and obesity, it is important to adjust protocols to capture the balance between image quality and radiation dose received in overweight patients. Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of increased body thickness in the pelvic region on the exposure conditions, image quality and dose received (DAP, effective dose and dose to selected organs) in pelvic radiography. Methods: The study was divided into two parts. The first part consisted of measurements on a phantom, adding a layer of animal fat up to 15 cm thick to simulate increased body thickness. The DAP, primary field size, mAs, kV and source-to-skin distance were measured, from which the effective dose was calculated. In the second part, measurements were conducted on 100 patients referred for pelvic radiography and randomly divided into two groups. One group was imaged using the current protocol (81 kV) and the other group was imaged using the new protocol (85 kV). Body height and mass, DAP, primary field size, source-to-skin distance, mAs and kV were measured in all patients. Body part thickness, BMI and effective dose were calculated from the measurements. In both parts, the quality of the radiographs was objectively evaluated by SNR and CNR. Results: The results of the phantom measurements showed that DAP and effective dose increase with increasing fat thickness at constant anodic voltage, while DAP and effective dose decrease exponentially with increasing anodic voltage at the same fat thickness. Higher fat thickness decreases SNR and CNR, but these remain above the optimum value. In the second phase of the patient study, we found that the new protocol decreased DAP by 7.6%, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.280). Also, the effective dose decreased by 4.1% with the new protocol, but this difference was again not statistically significant (p = 0.413). The difference in image quality between the two protocols was not statistically significant for either SNR (p = 0.165) or CNR (p = 0.124). The testicles received the highest mean dose. Despite the noticeable differences in doses between organs, there were no statistically significant differences between the protocols for any organ. Discussion and conclusion: The thickness of the pelvic region affects the DAP, the effective dose and the objective image quality. When x-ray imaging patients with a higher body part thickness, it is recommended to consider the use of higher anode voltages to reduce radiation exposure and maintain optimal image quality.
|