izpis_h1_title_alt

Postopek posvojitve v okviru novega Družinskega zakonika skozi izkušnje strokovnih delavk
ID Kričej, Pia (Author), ID Sobočan, Ana Marija (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,00 MB)
MD5: D9D7F309D5CF80FF2E78D0AC370056ED

Abstract
Leta 2019 se je na področju posvojitev pričel uporabljati Družinski zakonik. V svojem magistrskem delu predstavljam izkušnje strokovnih delavk ob zamenjavi zakonodaje. V izvedeni študiji primera sem se osredotočila na to, kako je sprememba zakonodaje vplivala na delo strokovnih delavk v postopkih posvojitve in kakšnih priprav so bile deležne strokovne delavke zaposlene na področju posvojitev. Zanimalo me je, katere priložnosti je Družinski zakonik odprl ter s katerimi ovirami ali dilemami so se strokovne delavke soočale ob pričetku uporabe novega Družinskega zakonika na področju posvojitev ter katere prednosti in slabosti spremembe zakonodaje na področju posvojitev izpostavljajo. Zanimalo me je tudi, kakšno je sodelovanje med sodišči in centri za socialno delo ter njihovimi strokovnimi delavci. Na podlagi rezultatov ugotavljam, da se postopek posvojitve kljub skrajšanju zakonsko predpisanega roka ni skrajšal, da potrebnega sodelovanja in komunikacije med sodišči in centri za socialno delo ni, ob tem pa je zamenjava zakonodaje socialnim delavkam prinesla dodatno obremenitev. Socialne delavke, ki so imele le malo možnosti za sodelovanje pri implementaciji Družinskega zakonika, v praksi vidijo malo prednosti v novi zakonodaji. Kot največja sprememba in prednost se je izkazal prenos pristojnosti odločanja s centrov za socialno delo na sodišča. V praksi se je pokazalo, da sodniki ne poznajo stroke socialnega dela. Sistemsko niso bile organizirane nobene priprave ali izobraževanja ob zamenjavi zakonodaje. Socialne delavke so na obravnavah na sodiščih deležne pritiskov, dvomov in nezaupanja s strani sodnikov. Menjava zakonodaje je negativno vplivala na že vzpostavljen delovni odnos med socialno delavko in uporabniki. Od začetka uporabe Družinskega zakonika teče peto leto, a so kljub trudu za izboljšanje prakse tako s strani centra kot sodišč še vedno prisotne težave, na katere socialne delavke aktivno opozarjajo.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:posvojitev, sodišča, Družinski zakonik, izkušnje socialnih delavk, zamenjava zakonodaje, sprememba pristojnosti odločanja, sodelovanje s sodišči
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FSD - Faculty of Social Work
Year:2024
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-162698 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.09.2024
Views:131
Downloads:9
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The adoption process by the new Family Code through the experience of professionals
Abstract:
In 2019, the Family Code began to be applied in the field of adoptions in Slovenia. In my master's thesis, I present the experiences of social workers during the change of legislation. In the conducted case study, I focused on how the change in legislation affected the work of social workers in adoption procedures and what preparations they had. What opportunities the Family Code opened up and what obstacles or dilemmas did social workers face when the new Family Code was applied in the area of adoptions, and what advantages and disadvantages of the change in legislation in the area of adoptions do they highlight. I was also interested in the cooperation between courts and centers for social work and their professionals. Based on the results, I conclude that the adoption process has not been shortened, despite the shortening of the statutory deadline. Cooperation and communication between courts and centers for social work does not take place. The change in legislation meant an additional burden on social workers. Social workers had few opportunities to participate in the implementation of the Family Code. In practice, social workers see few advantages in the new legislation. The biggest change and advantage was the transfer of decision-making powers from the social work centers to the courts. In practice, it has been shown that judges do not know the profession of social work. Systemically, no preparation or training was organized in connection with the change of legislation. Social workers are subjected to pressure, doubts and mistrust from the judges during court hearings. Social workers actively point out problems. The change in legislation had a negative impact on the already established working relationship between the social worker and their clients. It has been five years since the introduction of the Family Code, and there are still problems, despite the efforts of both social workers and judges to improve practice.

Keywords:adoption, courts, Family Code, experiences of social workers, change of legislation, change of decision-making powers, cooperation with courts

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back