izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava funkcionalnosti izbranih videokonferenčnih okolij : diplomsko delo
ID Stare, Manca (Author), ID Keržič, Damijana (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (582,22 KB)
MD5: 6AE2648DD7675344E74509E5BB542A23

Abstract
Videokonference so pomembno orodje v sodobnem času, še posebej v obdobju, ko sta delo in izobraževanje na daljavo postala del vsakdana. Razvoj tehnologije je omogočil hitro širjenje in dostopnost videokonferenčnih okolij, ki so postala nepogrešljiva za poslovne in izobraževalne namene. Preučevanje in primerjava teh platform v diplomskem delu zagotavljata vpogled v njihove funkcionalnosti, prednosti, slabosti ter uporabniške izkušnje. Diplomsko delo se osredotoča na analizo in primerjavo uporabe treh videokonferenčnih programskih okolij: Zoom, MS Teams in BigBlueButton. Cilji diplomskega dela vključujejo predstavitev razvoja spletnih konferenc ter primerjalno analizo uporabe omenjenih okolij. Raziskovalna vprašanja, ki smo jih zastavili, se nanašajo na prednosti, uporabniško prijaznost ter primernost za skupinsko sodelovalno delo posameznih videokonferenčnih platform. Zoom je prinesel pozitivne izkušnje glede zanesljivosti programa, vendar so se pojavile omejitve v funkcionalnostih brez plačljive različice. MS Teams je dosegel pozitivne rezultate, vendar so se pokazale omejitve v funkcionalnosti spletne različice. BigBlueButton je prinesel učinkovito izvedbo, vendar z nekaterimi manjšimi pomanjkljivostmi. Analiza tako poudarja, da ima vsako videokonferenčno okolje svoje prednosti in slabosti, zato izbira temelji na specifičnih potrebah uporabnikov.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:videokonferenčna okolja, funkcionalnosti, Zoom, MS Teams, BigBlueButton, uporabniška izkušnja
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[M. Stare]
Year:2024
Number of pages:X, 53 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-156058 This link opens in a new window
UDC:004.773.5(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:195471107 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:06.05.2024
Views:99
Downloads:14
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of functionalities of selected video conferencing environments
Abstract:
Video conferencing is a crucial tool in modern times, especially in the period when remote work and education have become part of everyday life. The development of technology has facilitated the rapid expansion and accessibility of video conferencing environments, making them indispensable for both business and educational purposes. Examining and comparing these platforms in a thesis provides insights into their functionalities, advantages, disadvantages, and user experiences. The thesis focuses on the analysis and comparison of the usage of three video conferencing software environments: Zoom, MS Teams, and BigBlueButton. The objectives of the thesis include presenting the evolution of web conferences and conducting a comparative analysis of the usage of the mentioned environments. The research questions address the advantages, user-friendliness, and suitability for collaborative group work of each video conferencing platform. The thesis consists of six chapters, including an introduction that outlines the purpose, objectives, and research questions. The second chapter concentrates on the development of video conferences, technological components, and telecommunication standards. The third chapter introduces the selected video conferencing environments, while the fourth chapter systematically analyzes the functionalities of these platforms. The fifth chapter presents findings and answers to the research questions. Zoom provided positive experiences regarding program reliability, but limitations arose in the functionalities of the free version. MS Teams achieved positive results, but limitations were evident in the functionality of the web version. BigBlueButton delivered effective performance, albeit with some minor shortcomings. The analysis emphasizes that each video conferencing environment has its advantages and disadvantages, and the choice depends on the specific needs of users.

Keywords:video conferencing environments, remote work and education, functionalities, Zoom, MS Teams, BigBlueButton, comparison, advantages, disadvantages, user experience.

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back