izpis_h1_title_alt

Transcultural sublation of concepts and objects through the lens of Adorno and Gongsun Long
ID Rošker, Jana S. (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (835,74 KB)
MD5: 2F50C77AC4DCB145A71CD170FB51FE95
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2023-0023/html This link opens in a new window

Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate a new approach to transcultural postcomparative philosophy, which may be tentatively called “the method of sublation,” using the example of Adorno and Gong Sunlong’s respective views on the relationship between concepts and objects. The term sublation is a neologism commonly used to translate Hegel’s idea of Aufhebung. It is derived from the Latin term sublatio, for its original meaning covered all three crucial connotations of Hegel’s Aufhebung – to lift up, to preserve and to eliminate. The method thus encompasses all three of these three notions that are crucial to any process of creating something new from the interactions between two or more distinct discourses. In this philosophical sense, it has the three meanings of producing, eliminating, and preserving arguments, propositions, or ideas. Moreover, unlike “synthesis” the term “sublation” refers to a process rather than a stage. The sublation method aims to develop new forms of transcultural philosophizing and to overcome the impasses of traditional comparative approaches through procedures of “conceptual comparison” rather than relying only on the “comparison of concepts”. It starts from similarities and differences identified in the basic paradigms of different culturally and semantically defined frames of reference, and uses the method of discursive translation to transfer meanings across different languages and ideational traditions. Through a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences between Adorno’s and Gongsun Longs conceptions of concepts and objects (or names and realities, respectively), the paper demonstrates the importance of considering different culturally conditioned paradigms and frames of reference in order to gain new, more complex, and more pluralistic philosophical insights.

Language:English
Keywords:Chinese philosophy, comparative philosophy, sublation, Adorno, Gongsun Long
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 129-159
Numbering:Vol. 6, iss. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-152600 This link opens in a new window
UDC:1(510)
ISSN on article:2196-5897
DOI:10.1515/yewph-2023-0023 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:156489475 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:30.11.2023
Views:207
Downloads:15
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Yearbook for Eastern and Western philosophy
Shortened title:Yearb. East. West. philos.
Publisher:De Gruyter
ISSN:2196-5897
COBISS.SI-ID:54985987 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:kitajska filozofija, primerjalna filozofija, sublacija, Adorno, Gongsun Long

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back