Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Transcultural sublation of concepts and objects through the lens of Adorno and Gongsun Long
ID
Rošker, Jana S.
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(835,74 KB)
MD5: 2F50C77AC4DCB145A71CD170FB51FE95
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2023-0023/html
Image galllery
Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate a new approach to transcultural postcomparative philosophy, which may be tentatively called “the method of sublation,” using the example of Adorno and Gong Sunlong’s respective views on the relationship between concepts and objects. The term sublation is a neologism commonly used to translate Hegel’s idea of Aufhebung. It is derived from the Latin term sublatio, for its original meaning covered all three crucial connotations of Hegel’s Aufhebung – to lift up, to preserve and to eliminate. The method thus encompasses all three of these three notions that are crucial to any process of creating something new from the interactions between two or more distinct discourses. In this philosophical sense, it has the three meanings of producing, eliminating, and preserving arguments, propositions, or ideas. Moreover, unlike “synthesis” the term “sublation” refers to a process rather than a stage. The sublation method aims to develop new forms of transcultural philosophizing and to overcome the impasses of traditional comparative approaches through procedures of “conceptual comparison” rather than relying only on the “comparison of concepts”. It starts from similarities and differences identified in the basic paradigms of different culturally and semantically defined frames of reference, and uses the method of discursive translation to transfer meanings across different languages and ideational traditions. Through a contrastive analysis of the similarities and differences between Adorno’s and Gongsun Longs conceptions of concepts and objects (or names and realities, respectively), the paper demonstrates the importance of considering different culturally conditioned paradigms and frames of reference in order to gain new, more complex, and more pluralistic philosophical insights.
Language:
English
Keywords:
Chinese philosophy
,
comparative philosophy
,
sublation
,
Adorno
,
Gongsun Long
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2023
Number of pages:
Str. 129-159
Numbering:
Vol. 6, iss. 1
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-152600
UDC:
1(510)
ISSN on article:
2196-5897
DOI:
10.1515/yewph-2023-0023
COBISS.SI-ID:
156489475
Publication date in RUL:
30.11.2023
Views:
489
Downloads:
44
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Yearbook for Eastern and Western philosophy
Shortened title:
Yearb. East. West. philos.
Publisher:
De Gruyter
ISSN:
2196-5897
COBISS.SI-ID:
54985987
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
kitajska filozofija
,
primerjalna filozofija
,
sublacija
,
Adorno
,
Gongsun Long
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back