izpis_h1_title_alt

Strategies for strengthening the resilience of public health systems for pandemics, disasters, and other emergencies
ID Ryan, Benjamin J. (Author), ID Kako, Mayumi (Author), ID Fink, Rok (Author), ID Simsek, Perihan (Author), ID Barach, Paul (Author), ID Acosta, Jose (Author), ID Bhatia, Sanjaya (Author), ID Brickhouse, Mark (Author), ID Fendt, Matthew (Author), ID Fontenot, Alicia (Author), et al.

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (376,52 KB)
MD5: FE26F33B445B258A327834FCA901C5E3
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness/article/strategies-for-strengthening-the-resilience-of-public-health-systems-for-pandemics-disasters-and-other-emergencies/B96BFF211DDE09B7F4AEEC7D8FC47A3F This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize strategies for strengthening public health system resilience for pandemics, disasters, and other emergencies using a scorecard approach. Methods: The United Nations Public Health System Resilience Scorecard (Scorecard) was applied across 5 workshops in Slovenia, Turkey, and the United States of America. The workshops focused on participants reviewing and discussing 23 questions/indicators. A Likert type scale was used for scoring with zero being the lowest and 5 the highest. The workshop scores were analyzed and discussed by participants to prioritize areas of need and develop resilience strategies. Data from all workshops were aggregated, analyzed, and interpreted to develop priorities representative of participating locations. Results: Eight themes emerged representing the need for better integration of public health and disaster management systems. These include: assessing community disease burden; embedding long-term recovery groups in emergency systems; exploring mental health care needs; examining ecosystem risks; evaluating reserve funds; identifying what crisis communication strategies worked well; providing non-medical services; and reviewing resilience of existing facilities, alternate care sites, and institutions. Conclusions: The Scorecard is an effective tool for establishing baseline resilience and prioritizing actions. The strategies identified reflect areas in most need for investment to improve public health system resilience.

Language:English
Keywords:COVID-19 pandemic, health system, resilience, workshops, public policy
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:05.09.2023
Year:2023
Number of pages:13 str.
Numbering:Vol. 17, art. e479
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-150605 This link opens in a new window
UDC:614.2:616-036.21
ISSN on article:1938-744X
DOI:10.1017/dmp.2023.136 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:165159171 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.09.2023
Views:517
Downloads:17
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Disaster medicine and public health preparedness
Shortened title:Disaster med. public health prep.
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:1938-744X
COBISS.SI-ID:522431001 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Undetermined
Keywords:pandemija COVID-19, zdravstveni sistem, odpornost, delavnice, javna politika

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back