izpis_h1_title_alt

Strategies for strengthening the resilience of public health systems for pandemics, disasters, and other emergencies
ID Ryan, Benjamin J. (Avtor), ID Kako, Mayumi (Avtor), ID Fink, Rok (Avtor), ID Simsek, Perihan (Avtor), ID Barach, Paul (Avtor), ID Acosta, Jose (Avtor), ID Bhatia, Sanjaya (Avtor), ID Brickhouse, Mark (Avtor), ID Fendt, Matthew (Avtor), ID Fontenot, Alicia (Avtor), et al.

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (376,52 KB)
MD5: FE26F33B445B258A327834FCA901C5E3
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness/article/strategies-for-strengthening-the-resilience-of-public-health-systems-for-pandemics-disasters-and-other-emergencies/B96BFF211DDE09B7F4AEEC7D8FC47A3F Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize strategies for strengthening public health system resilience for pandemics, disasters, and other emergencies using a scorecard approach. Methods: The United Nations Public Health System Resilience Scorecard (Scorecard) was applied across 5 workshops in Slovenia, Turkey, and the United States of America. The workshops focused on participants reviewing and discussing 23 questions/indicators. A Likert type scale was used for scoring with zero being the lowest and 5 the highest. The workshop scores were analyzed and discussed by participants to prioritize areas of need and develop resilience strategies. Data from all workshops were aggregated, analyzed, and interpreted to develop priorities representative of participating locations. Results: Eight themes emerged representing the need for better integration of public health and disaster management systems. These include: assessing community disease burden; embedding long-term recovery groups in emergency systems; exploring mental health care needs; examining ecosystem risks; evaluating reserve funds; identifying what crisis communication strategies worked well; providing non-medical services; and reviewing resilience of existing facilities, alternate care sites, and institutions. Conclusions: The Scorecard is an effective tool for establishing baseline resilience and prioritizing actions. The strategies identified reflect areas in most need for investment to improve public health system resilience.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:COVID-19 pandemic, health system, resilience, workshops, public policy
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:ZF - Zdravstvena fakulteta
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Datum objave:05.09.2023
Leto izida:2023
Št. strani:13 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 17, art. e479
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-150605 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:614.2:616-036.21
ISSN pri članku:1938-744X
DOI:10.1017/dmp.2023.136 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:165159171 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:21.09.2023
Število ogledov:574
Število prenosov:18
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Disaster medicine and public health preparedness
Skrajšan naslov:Disaster med. public health prep.
Založnik:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:1938-744X
COBISS.SI-ID:522431001 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Ni določen
Ključne besede:pandemija COVID-19, zdravstveni sistem, odpornost, delavnice, javna politika

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj