izpis_h1_title_alt

Programska orodja za vodenje projektov: Uspešnost izvajanja projekta s pomočjo brezplačnih programskih orodij in primerjava brezplačnih orodij s plačljivim
ID Horvatič, David (Author), ID Rihar, Lidija (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Kušar, Janez (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,42 MB)
MD5: 464CB18CE96AD7F6CF83E52E971F4B5C
.pngPNG - Appendix, Download (170,21 KB)
MD5: 1F73533AEAD4B29EBCBFAE9700F45921

Abstract
Pri vodenju projektov so danes v pomoč številna programska orodja, cilj teh je poenostaviti delo in uporabniku ponuditi natančnejši vpogled v projekt ter mu posledično omogočiti tudi boljši nadzor in upravljanje projekta. V primeru uporabe uveljavljenega programskega orodja, kot je Microsoft Project, bi za izvajanje projekta potrebovali dodatna finančna sredstva, ki morda niso na voljo mnogim manjšim podjetjem ali posameznikom. V zaključni nalogi bo izvedena primerjava plačljivega programa Microsoft Project s tremi brezplačnimi alternativami. Na vseh programih bo izvajan enak projekt implementacije sistema GreenHub. Pri tem bo v nalogi postavljena raziskovalna hipoteza, da se projekt lahko v večinskem deležu izpelje z uporabo brezplačnih programskih orodij. Predpostavi se, da imajo brezplačna orodja določene pomanjkljivosti. Cilj naloge bo izpostaviti pomanjkljivosti brezplačnih orodij in opredeliti, do kolikšne mere so ta za vodenje projekta še praktično uporabna. Za natančno opredelitev in za potrditev hipoteze bodo orodja primerjana z uporabo hiše kakovosti kot del metode uvajanja funkcij kakovosti (ang. Quality function deployment ali QFD). Za potrditev ali zavrnitev postavljene hipoteze bodo uporabljene raziskovalne metode kompilacije in deskripcije ter deduktivna metoda

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:projekt, projektno vodenje, programsko orodje, primerjava orodij, hiša kakovosti
Work type:Final paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[D. Horvatič]
Year:2023
Number of pages:XII, 50 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-148548 This link opens in a new window
UDC:005.8:004.4(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:163802371 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.08.2023
Views:482
Downloads:36
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Project Management Software Tools: Successful project execution using free software tools and comparison of free tools with a paid one
Abstract:
When managing projects, there are numerous software tools available today that aim to simplify the work and provide the user with a more detailed insight into the project. This, in turn, enables better control and management of the project. If one were to use an established software tool like Microsoft Project, additional financial resources would be required, which might not be available to many smaller companies or individuals. In the final assignment, a comparison will be made between the paid Microsoft Project software and three free alternatives. The same GreenHub system implementation project will be carried out on all these platforms. The research hypothesis posed in the assignment is that the project can be predominantly executed using free software tools. It is assumed that free tools have certain shortcomings. The goal of the assignment will be to highlight the shortcomings of the free tools and determine to what extent they are still practically usable for project management. To precisely define and confirm the hypothesis, the tools will be compared using the House of Quality as part of the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method. Research methods including compilation, description, and the deductive method will be used to confirm or reject the posed hypothesis.

Keywords:project, project management, software tool, comparison of tools, house of quality

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back