izpis_h1_title_alt

Analiza trga orodij za spletne ankete : diplomsko delo
ID Dokleja, Gregor (Author), ID Vehovar, Vasja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (4,05 MB)
MD5: E7257C53DD045785BF402E39BF2D7FC7

Abstract
Ponudba orodij za spletno anketiranje je zelo velika, zato je iskanje primernega orodja lahko težavno. Pri tem si lahko pomagamo s spletnimi viri, ki zbirajo sezname teh orodij, kar je tudi predmet obravnave v pričujočem diplomskem delu. V tem okviru najprej opredelimo pojme, povezane s spletnim anketiranjem, predstavimo razvoj orodij za spletno anketiranje in tudi odgovarjajočega trga teh orodij. V empiričnem delu analiziramo cene in funkcionalnost orodij, ki se nahajajo na seznamih agregatorjev Capterra in G2, ter funkcionalna orodja s seznama WebSM. Ugotavljamo, da večina orodij ponuja funkcionalnosti v najmanj dveh paketih. V prvem (praviloma brezplačnem) paketu so možnosti zelo omejene in običajno ne vključujejo podpore za pogojne stavke. Za drugi (oziroma prvi plačljivi) paket pa je značilno, da praviloma vsebuje podporo za napredne pogoje in tudi vmesnik za prilagajanja oblike oziroma dizajna, skoraj nikoli pa ne vključuje vmesnika za jezikovne različice, kar je tudi najbolj tipična funkcionalnost naprednih paketov. Poleg poslovnega modela, kjer se funkcionalnosti ponujajo v paketih, nekatera orodja uporabljajo tudi cenovni model, ki se obračunava po številu izpolnjenih anket, najnaprednejša orodja pa standardiziranih cen sploh ne objavljajo, ampak izdelajo ponudbo glede posebnosti vsake stranke. Poleg omejevanja samih funkcionalnosti pa nekatera orodja v svojih paketih omejujejo tudi prostor za shranjevanje multimedijskih datotek.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:spletna anketa, orodje za spletne ankete, trg orodij za spletne ankete, Capterra, G2.
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:G. Dokleja
Year:2023
Number of pages:130 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-148111 This link opens in a new window
UDC:303.6:004(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:161457667 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:27.07.2023
Views:501
Downloads:51
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Market analysis of web survey tools
Abstract:
The range of web survey tools is very large, which makes finding the right tool difficult. This can be done by using online resources that collect lists of these tools, which is also the subject of this thesis. In this context, we first define the concepts related to web surveys, present the development of web survey tools and also the market for these tools. In the empirical part, we analyze the prices and functionality of the tools found on the Capterra and G2 aggregator lists, as well as the functional web survey tools from the WebSM list. We find that most of the tools offer functionalities in at least two packages. In the first (usually free) package, the options are very limited and usually do not include support for conditional statements. The second (or first paid) package is characterized by the fact that it usually includes support for advanced conditionals and an interface for format or design adjustments, but almost never includes an interface for language versions, which is also the most typical functionality of advanced packages. In addition to the business model, where functionalities are offered in packages, some tools also use a pricing model, in which the client is billed on the basis of the number of completed surveys, while the most advanced tools do not publish standardized prices, but instead make an offer according to the specificities of each client. In addition to limiting the functionality itself, some tools also limit the storage space for multimedia files in their packages.

Keywords:web survey, web survey software, web survey software market, Capterra, G2.

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back