izpis_h1_title_alt

Logging residue chipping options for short rotation poplar plantations
ID Spinelli, Raffaele (Author), ID Mihelič, Matevž (Author), ID Kováč, Barnabáš (Author), ID Heger, Patrik (Author), ID Magagnotti, Natascia (Author)

URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4130-015 This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,01 MB)
MD5: 9C7E86C1BB5EDF584138E81794A2ACE9

Abstract
Short rotation poplar plantations grow on flat and even terrain, and the interrow spacing is wide enough for easy machine access. If the terrain is firm enough, one may consider moving the classic roadside chipping operation directly into the field (i.e., terrain chipping), thus saving on wood extraction cost. This study compared the efficiency and cost of roadside and terrain chipping conducted with exactly the same equipment, to assess the benefits offered by the versatile deployment of a standard chipping operation, whereby the operation can be moved inside the stand whenever terrain conditions are suitable. The study was conducted at 12 sample plots, containing about one truck load of chips each (i.e., approximately 11 bone-dry tons or BDT). Plots were arranged as alternate windrows on a 8.5 ha field. Data was collected for the whole supply chain, from field to factory. The factory was located 14 km from the field. Delivered cost was 53 € BDT-1 and 70 € BDT-1 for roadside and terrain chipping, respectively, i.e., terrain chipping was 1/3 more expensive than roadside chipping, even if the latter included the additional cost of forwarding the residues to the roadside. The chipper-truck used for the test could not cope with small scattered residue piles (32 BDT ha-1), and the cumbersome reposition maneuver became the main hurdle to efficient operation. Further improvements might be achieved by pre-bunching the residues, introducing a dedicated terrain chipper or bundling the residues and taking the bundles to the factory for centralized chipping.

Language:English
Keywords:forestry, efficiency, productivity, cost
Work type:Abstract or summary
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2023
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 23-29
Numbering:Vol. 16, feb.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-146690 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*
ISSN on article:1971-7458
DOI:10.3832/ifor4130-015 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:154791427 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:07.06.2023
Views:266
Downloads:31
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:IForest
Shortened title:IForest
Publisher:SISEF
ISSN:1971-7458
COBISS.SI-ID:2513830 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:gozdarstvo, učinkovitost, produktivnost, stroški, spravilo lesa

Projects

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:European Commission
Project number:745874
Name:Securing Sustainable Dendromass Production with Poplar Plantations in European Rural Areas
Acronym:Dendromass4Europe

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:Pahernikova fundacija
Project number:Pahernikova fundacija
Name:Pahernikova fundacija
Acronym:Pahernikova fundacija

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back