Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Logging residue chipping options for short rotation poplar plantations
ID
Spinelli, Raffaele
(
Author
),
ID
Mihelič, Matevž
(
Author
),
ID
Kováč, Barnabáš
(
Author
),
ID
Heger, Patrik
(
Author
),
ID
Magagnotti, Natascia
(
Author
)
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4130-015
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,01 MB)
MD5: 9C7E86C1BB5EDF584138E81794A2ACE9
Image galllery
Abstract
Short rotation poplar plantations grow on flat and even terrain, and the interrow spacing is wide enough for easy machine access. If the terrain is firm enough, one may consider moving the classic roadside chipping operation directly into the field (i.e., terrain chipping), thus saving on wood extraction cost. This study compared the efficiency and cost of roadside and terrain chipping conducted with exactly the same equipment, to assess the benefits offered by the versatile deployment of a standard chipping operation, whereby the operation can be moved inside the stand whenever terrain conditions are suitable. The study was conducted at 12 sample plots, containing about one truck load of chips each (i.e., approximately 11 bone-dry tons or BDT). Plots were arranged as alternate windrows on a 8.5 ha field. Data was collected for the whole supply chain, from field to factory. The factory was located 14 km from the field. Delivered cost was 53 € BDT-1 and 70 € BDT-1 for roadside and terrain chipping, respectively, i.e., terrain chipping was 1/3 more expensive than roadside chipping, even if the latter included the additional cost of forwarding the residues to the roadside. The chipper-truck used for the test could not cope with small scattered residue piles (32 BDT ha-1), and the cumbersome reposition maneuver became the main hurdle to efficient operation. Further improvements might be achieved by pre-bunching the residues, introducing a dedicated terrain chipper or bundling the residues and taking the bundles to the factory for centralized chipping.
Language:
English
Keywords:
forestry
,
efficiency
,
productivity
,
cost
Work type:
Abstract or summary
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
01.01.2023
Year:
2023
Number of pages:
Str. 23-29
Numbering:
Vol. 16, feb.
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-146690
UDC:
630*
ISSN on article:
1971-7458
DOI:
10.3832/ifor4130-015
COBISS.SI-ID:
154791427
Publication date in RUL:
07.06.2023
Views:
494
Downloads:
55
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
IForest
Shortened title:
IForest
Publisher:
SISEF
ISSN:
1971-7458
COBISS.SI-ID:
2513830
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
gozdarstvo
,
učinkovitost
,
produktivnost
,
stroški
,
spravilo lesa
Projects
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Funding programme:
European Commission
Project number:
745874
Name:
Securing Sustainable Dendromass Production with Poplar Plantations in European Rural Areas
Acronym:
Dendromass4Europe
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
Pahernikova fundacija
Project number:
Pahernikova fundacija
Name:
Pahernikova fundacija
Acronym:
Pahernikova fundacija
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back