izpis_h1_title_alt

Evaluation of two broadly used commercial methods for detection of respiratory viruses with a recently added new target for detection of SARS-CoV-2
ID Jevšnik Virant, Monika (Author), ID Uršič, Tina (Author), ID Kogoj, Rok (Author), ID Korva, Miša (Author), ID Petrovec, Miroslav (Author), ID Avšič-Županc, Tatjana (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (571,86 KB)
MD5: CCDC405825CC55B847F63B5E46CA20C7
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/7/1530 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
The clinical symptoms caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are nonspecific and can be associated with most other respiratory viruses that cause acute respiratory tract infections (ARI). Because the clinical differentiation of COVID-19 patients from those with other respiratory viruses is difficult, the evaluation of automated methods to detect important respiratory viruses together with SARS-CoV-2 seems necessary. Therefore, this study compares two molecular assays for the detection of respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2: the Respiratory Viruses 16-Well Assay (AusDiagnostics, Pty Ltd., Mascot, Australia) and the Allplex™ RV Essential Assay coupled with the Allplex™-nCoV Assay (Seegene Inc., Seoul, Korea). The two methods (AusDiagnostics and Allplex™-nCoV Assay SARS-CoV-2) had 98.6% agreement with the reference method, cobas 6800, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Agreement between the AusDiagnostics assay and the Allplex™ RV Essential Assay for the detection of seven respiratory viruses was 99%. In our experience, the Respiratory Viruses 16-Well Assay proved to be the most valuable and useful medium-throughput method for simultaneous detection of important respiratory viruses and SARS-CoV-2. The main advantages of the method are high specificity for all targets included and their simultaneous detection and medium throughput with the option of having multiple instruments provide a constant run.

Language:English
Keywords:respiratory viruses, validation, molecular assay, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2022
Number of pages:10 str.
Numbering:Vol. 14, iss. 7, art. 1530
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-145236 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616.2
ISSN on article:1999-4915
DOI:10.3390/v14071530 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:115279619 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:13.04.2023
Views:384
Downloads:48
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Viruses
Shortened title:Viruses
Publisher:MDPI
ISSN:1999-4915
COBISS.SI-ID:517597977 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:respiratorni virusi, validacija, molekularni test

Projects

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:P3-0083
Name:Odnosi parazitskega obstajanja

Funder:ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:V3-2034
Name:Epidemiologija, diagnostika, zdravljenje in preprečevanje COVID-19

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:H2020
Project number:871029
Name:European Virus Archive GLOBAL
Acronym:EVA-GLOBAL

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back