Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Evaluation of two broadly used commercial methods for detection of respiratory viruses with a recently added new target for detection of SARS-CoV-2
ID
Jevšnik Virant, Monika
(
Author
),
ID
Uršič, Tina
(
Author
),
ID
Kogoj, Rok
(
Author
),
ID
Korva, Miša
(
Author
),
ID
Petrovec, Miroslav
(
Author
),
ID
Avšič-Županc, Tatjana
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(571,86 KB)
MD5: CCDC405825CC55B847F63B5E46CA20C7
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/7/1530
Image galllery
Abstract
The clinical symptoms caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are nonspecific and can be associated with most other respiratory viruses that cause acute respiratory tract infections (ARI). Because the clinical differentiation of COVID-19 patients from those with other respiratory viruses is difficult, the evaluation of automated methods to detect important respiratory viruses together with SARS-CoV-2 seems necessary. Therefore, this study compares two molecular assays for the detection of respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2: the Respiratory Viruses 16-Well Assay (AusDiagnostics, Pty Ltd., Mascot, Australia) and the Allplex™ RV Essential Assay coupled with the Allplex™-nCoV Assay (Seegene Inc., Seoul, Korea). The two methods (AusDiagnostics and Allplex™-nCoV Assay SARS-CoV-2) had 98.6% agreement with the reference method, cobas 6800, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Agreement between the AusDiagnostics assay and the Allplex™ RV Essential Assay for the detection of seven respiratory viruses was 99%. In our experience, the Respiratory Viruses 16-Well Assay proved to be the most valuable and useful medium-throughput method for simultaneous detection of important respiratory viruses and SARS-CoV-2. The main advantages of the method are high specificity for all targets included and their simultaneous detection and medium throughput with the option of having multiple instruments provide a constant run.
Language:
English
Keywords:
respiratory viruses
,
validation
,
molecular assay
,
SARS-CoV-2
,
COVID-19
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2022
Number of pages:
10 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 14, iss. 7, art. 1530
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-145236
UDC:
616.2
ISSN on article:
1999-4915
DOI:
10.3390/v14071530
COBISS.SI-ID:
115279619
Publication date in RUL:
13.04.2023
Views:
631
Downloads:
80
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Viruses
Shortened title:
Viruses
Publisher:
MDPI
ISSN:
1999-4915
COBISS.SI-ID:
517597977
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
respiratorni virusi
,
validacija
,
molekularni test
Projects
Funder:
Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
P3-0083
Name:
Odnosi parazitskega obstajanja
Funder:
ARRS - Slovenian Research Agency
Project number:
V3-2034
Name:
Epidemiologija, diagnostika, zdravljenje in preprečevanje COVID-19
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Funding programme:
H2020
Project number:
871029
Name:
European Virus Archive GLOBAL
Acronym:
EVA-GLOBAL
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back