Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
European private forest owner typologies : a review of methods and use
ID
Ficko, Andrej
(
Author
),
ID
Lidestav, Gun
(
Author
),
ID
Ní Dhubháin, Áine
(
Author
),
ID
Karppinen, Heimo
(
Author
),
ID
Živojinović, Ivana
(
Author
),
ID
Westin, Kerstin
(
Author
)
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010
Image galllery
Abstract
The increasing diversity of non-industrial private forest owners (PFOs) in Europe has been recognized by policy makers and the forestry sector at large. Typologies of these owners have been developed to provide an understanding of the diversity of owners' attitudes, values, beliefs, management objectives and behaviour. We analyzed PFO typologies from 28 European countries published from 1985 to 2015 in peer-reviewed journals and grey literature with respect to 1) research approaches and methods used; 2) typology objectives and problems addressed; 3) policy and management recommendations given. Using an on-line questionnaire we asked the first authors of the most relevant publications to retrospectively assess 4) the use of their typologies in education, science and forest policy. Most of the 66 publications reviewed share the common objective of providing a better understanding of forest ownership. Typologies were also developed to address roundwood mobilization, delivery of public goods, forest management approaches, involvement in PFO associations and entrepreneurship. The most common methodological approach was quantitative where owners were grouped by k-means clustering into 2 to 6 types and labelled with various names. Most frequently used labels were Multiobjective owners, Recreationists, Investors, Farmers, Indifferent owners, Conservationists, Multifunctional owners and Self-employed owners. Policy implications remain vague. The typologies had mostly been used in teaching and occasionally by politicians, civil servants or stakeholders. Only a half of the typologies had a follow-up study or was updated over time by the authors. After decades of classifying PFOs, it seems necessary to explore the link between typologies and forest owners' overt behaviour.
Language:
English
Keywords:
family forests
,
landowners
,
non-industrial
,
policy instruments
,
literature review
,
classification
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2019
Number of pages:
Str. 21-31
Numbering:
Vol. 99
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-114182
UDC:
630*68(4)(045)=111
ISSN on article:
1389-9341
DOI:
10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010
COBISS.SI-ID:
4884902
Publication date in RUL:
19.02.2020
Views:
1545
Downloads:
150
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Forest Policy and Economics. ǂa ǂcompanion journal to Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
1389-9341
COBISS.SI-ID:
21383173
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
lastniki gozodov
,
tipologija
,
Evropa
,
zasebni gozdovi
,
cilji gospodarjenja
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back