izpis_h1_title_alt

European private forest owner typologies : a review of methods and use
ID Ficko, Andrej (Avtor), ID Lidestav, Gun (Avtor), ID Ní Dhubháin, Áine (Avtor), ID Karppinen, Heimo (Avtor), ID Živojinović, Ivana (Avtor), ID Westin, Kerstin (Avtor)

URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
The increasing diversity of non-industrial private forest owners (PFOs) in Europe has been recognized by policy makers and the forestry sector at large. Typologies of these owners have been developed to provide an understanding of the diversity of owners' attitudes, values, beliefs, management objectives and behaviour. We analyzed PFO typologies from 28 European countries published from 1985 to 2015 in peer-reviewed journals and grey literature with respect to 1) research approaches and methods used; 2) typology objectives and problems addressed; 3) policy and management recommendations given. Using an on-line questionnaire we asked the first authors of the most relevant publications to retrospectively assess 4) the use of their typologies in education, science and forest policy. Most of the 66 publications reviewed share the common objective of providing a better understanding of forest ownership. Typologies were also developed to address roundwood mobilization, delivery of public goods, forest management approaches, involvement in PFO associations and entrepreneurship. The most common methodological approach was quantitative where owners were grouped by k-means clustering into 2 to 6 types and labelled with various names. Most frequently used labels were Multiobjective owners, Recreationists, Investors, Farmers, Indifferent owners, Conservationists, Multifunctional owners and Self-employed owners. Policy implications remain vague. The typologies had mostly been used in teaching and occasionally by politicians, civil servants or stakeholders. Only a half of the typologies had a follow-up study or was updated over time by the authors. After decades of classifying PFOs, it seems necessary to explore the link between typologies and forest owners' overt behaviour.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:family forests, landowners, non-industrial, policy instruments, literature review, classification
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:BF - Biotehniška fakulteta
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2019
Št. strani:Str. 21-31
Številčenje:Vol. 99
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-114182 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:630*68(4)(045)=111
ISSN pri članku:1389-9341
DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:4884902 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:19.02.2020
Število ogledov:924
Število prenosov:136
Metapodatki:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Forest Policy and Economics. ǂa ǂcompanion journal to Forest Ecology and Management
Založnik:Elsevier
ISSN:1389-9341
COBISS.SI-ID:21383173 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:lastniki gozodov, tipologija, Evropa, zasebni gozdovi, cilji gospodarjenja

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj