izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava Svetopisemske zgodbe o Adamu in Evi v Prvi Mojzesovi knjigi z apokrifom Življenje Adama in Eve : diplomsko delo
Franc, Nika (Author), Skralovnik, Samo (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (942,48 KB)

Abstract
V diplomskem delu sta predstavljeni svetopisemska in apokrifna zgodba o Adamu in Evi. V prvem delu diplomskega dela je obravnavana svetopisemska zgodba, ki se nahaja na začetku Prve Mojzesove knjige. Sveto pismo pozna dve različni pripovedi o stvarjenju in življenju prvega človeka. Poznamo jahvistično in duhovniško izročilo. Na človeka je bolj pozoren jahvist, ki obravnava določene teološke tematike, ki jih v duhovniškem izročilu ne najdemo, kot na primer: življenje v edenskem vrtu, greh in bratomor, poleg tega pa je jahvistično izročilo tisto, kjer je žena imenovana Eva. V drugem delu diplomskega dela pa je predstavljena apokrifna zgodba, ki opisuje življenje Adama in Eve po grehu in izgonu iz edenskega vrta. Celoten apokrif Življenje Adama in Eve je preveden v slovenščino iz angleškega prevoda, predstavljeni pa so tudi teološki poudarki apokrifa. Glavne teme, ki jih najdemo v apokrifu, so človeška stiska, kesanje in razodetje. Na koncu diplomskega dela je zapisana še primerjava obeh zgodb, svetopisemske in apokrifne. Čeprav apokrif dopolnjuje svetopisemsko zgodbo o prvem paru, saj se začne tam, kjer Sveto pismo zaključi pripoved o Adamu in Evi, lahko kot glavne razlike izpostavimo, da je v apokrifu bolj poudarjena krivda žene za greh, omenja se tudi Kristusov prihod in prav tako izvemo, zakaj je hudič zapeljal Adama in Evo v greh.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Adam, Eva, kanon, jahvistično izročilo, duhovniško izročilo, apokrif, primerjalna analiza
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper (mb11)
Tipology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:TEOF - Theological Faculty
Year:2019
Publisher:[N. Franc]
Number of pages:VI, 45 str.
UDC:27-245.66(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:11069443 Link is opened in a new window
Views:236
Downloads:92
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison between the biblical story of Adam and Eve in Genesis and the apocrypha the Life of Adam and Eve
Abstract:
In the diploma thesis the biblical and apocryphal story of Adam and Eve are presented. The first part deals with the Bible story at the beginning of Genesis. The Bible knows two different narratives of the creation and the life of the first man. We know the Jahvist and the priestly traditions; the Jahvist is more attentive to the man, as it deals with certain theological topics which cannot be found in the priestly tradition, for example: life in the Garden of Eden, sin and fratricide, and it is the Jahvist tradition where the woman is called Eve. The second part of the thesis presents an apocryphal story that describes the life of Adam and Eve after sin and the expulsion from the Garden of Eden. The whole apocrypha The Life of Adam and Eve is translated into Slovene from the English translation, and the theological emphasis of the apocrypha is also presented. The major themes found in the apocrypha are human distress, repentance, and revelation. At the end of the thesis, a comparison of the two stories, the biblical and the apocryphal, is written. Although the apocrypha complements the Bible story of the first couple, as it begins where the Bible concludes the story of Adam and Eve, the main differences are that the apocrypha emphasizes the guilt of the wife for sin, it mentions the coming of Christ, and it explains why the devil seduced Adam and Eve into sin.

Keywords:Adam, Eve, canon, Jahvist tradition, priesthood tradition, apocrypha, comparative analysis

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back