This research addresses the relationship between psychological flexibility, inflexibility, self-compassion and prejudice towards people with psychological disorders, particularly discovering the key predictors of prejudice. The research was conducted on a sample of 319 young adults (59 males) with the average age of 23.94 years. The results imply a negative relation between mindfulness and perceiving people with psychological disorders as unpredictable in their behavior. Self-compassion was positively related to psychological flexibility and negatively to inflexibility. Psychological inflexibility correlated negatively with psychological flexibility. The meaning of these two constructs is opposite, but not entirely; therefore, it is sensible to include both of them in the research. The regression model is unstable, but it points out the role of psychological inflexibility as a predictor of prejudice. Psychological flexibility had the key role in explaining prejudice only in combination with inflexibility. Self-compassion did not turn out as significant in predicting and explaining prejudice. It is necessary to emphasize that the correlations between psychological inflexibility and prejudice were not in accordance with our expectations. The regression coefficients also indicate that a higher degree of expressed psychological inflexibility correlates to a lower degree of expressed prejudice towards people with psychological disorders. The results make it impossible to form solid conclusions about the main research problem for the correlations between prejudice and other constructs in our study are weak and mostly not congruent with the previous results. Despite the discrepancies mentioned in the results, this thesis offers one of the first insights into the correlations between the constructs in the field of acceptance and commitment therapy and the already established constructs, such as stigma towards people with psychological disorders. These findings open up new questions and research possibilities. What is more, they introduce a relatively new terminology to the Slovenian research space, appeal to unify the expert terminology in the field of stigma and point out the constructs that with prior firmer empirical knowledge could be included in various mental health stigma reduction programs.
|