izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava čitljivosti rokopisne in linearne pisave ter pisave s serifi
Kovačič, Katja (Author), Pušnik, Nace (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,98 MB)
MD5: 147C9AD2CC0C219717703829DA5D7C1B

Abstract
V diplomskem delu smo predstavili področje tipografije. V prvem delu smo definirali osnovne teoretične vidike tipografije in opredelili značilnosti različnih pisav. Namen diplomskega dela je bil ugotoviti, katere pisave so na zaslonu bolj čitljive in hitreje berljive. Za upodabljanje na zaslonu ni primerna vsaka pisava, saj zaradi različnih oblikovnih značilnosti ne pripomore k hitremu zaznavanju in razumevanju napisanega. V raziskovalnem delu smo oblikovali lastno pisavo, ki smo jo digitalizirali na podlagi skic. Poimenovali smo jo citkat. V raziskavi smo pripravili tri besedila, ki so bila zapisana s tremi različnimi pisavami. Primerjali smo hitrost branja in število fiksacij. Rezultate raziskave smo pridobili s pomočjo naprave za sledenje očesnim premikom. S pomočjo raziskave smo prišli do zaključka, da se je rokopis za branje na zaslonu izkazal za primernejšega, kot smo pričakovali. Potrdili smo tudi začetno hipotezo, da se bo najbolje obnesla pisava s serifi, saj le-ti v besedilu delujejo kot pomožno orodje, ki bralca usmerja med črkami in besedami.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:digitalizacija, linearna pisava, pisava s serifi, rokopis, tipografija
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper (mb11)
Organization:NTF - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering
Year:2019
Views:489
Downloads:213
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Legibility comparison of handwritten, sans serif and serif typeface
Abstract:
In diploma thesis we presented the field of typographic design. In the first part, we determined the basic theoretical aspects of the typography in the defined characteristics of the fonts. The purpose of the diploma thesis was to determine which typefaces are better choice for using on the screen and are more legible and readable. Not all typefaces are suitable to be presented on the screen, as various design features do not contribute to faster processing and understanding. In our research work we digitalized our handwritten typeface, based on sketches we made at the beginning. The new typeface is named CitKat. Later on we prepared three different short texts, which were written with three different typefaces. We compared the reading speed and number of fixations in each text, using a device that tracks eye movements. In conclusion, our script turned out to be more appropriate, contrary to what we initially expected. We confirmed the initial hypothesis, that serif typeface would be the best choice to use on the screen, as serifs help to guide the reader's eye across the page.

Keywords:digitalization, script, sans serif typeface, serif typeface, typography

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back