20.500.12556/RUL-107801 Primerjava čitljivosti rokopisne in linearne pisave ter pisave s serifi Legibility comparison of handwritten, sans serif and serif typeface V diplomskem delu smo predstavili področje tipografije. V prvem delu smo definirali osnovne teoretične vidike tipografije in opredelili značilnosti različnih pisav. Namen diplomskega dela je bil ugotoviti, katere pisave so na zaslonu bolj čitljive in hitreje berljive. Za upodabljanje na zaslonu ni primerna vsaka pisava, saj zaradi različnih oblikovnih značilnosti ne pripomore k hitremu zaznavanju in razumevanju napisanega. V raziskovalnem delu smo oblikovali lastno pisavo, ki smo jo digitalizirali na podlagi skic. Poimenovali smo jo citkat. V raziskavi smo pripravili tri besedila, ki so bila zapisana s tremi različnimi pisavami. Primerjali smo hitrost branja in število fiksacij. Rezultate raziskave smo pridobili s pomočjo naprave za sledenje očesnim premikom. S pomočjo raziskave smo prišli do zaključka, da se je rokopis za branje na zaslonu izkazal za primernejšega, kot smo pričakovali. Potrdili smo tudi začetno hipotezo, da se bo najbolje obnesla pisava s serifi, saj le-ti v besedilu delujejo kot pomožno orodje, ki bralca usmerja med črkami in besedami. In diploma thesis we presented the field of typographic design. In the first part, we determined the basic theoretical aspects of the typography in the defined characteristics of the fonts. The purpose of the diploma thesis was to determine which typefaces are better choice for using on the screen and are more legible and readable. Not all typefaces are suitable to be presented on the screen, as various design features do not contribute to faster processing and understanding. In our research work we digitalized our handwritten typeface, based on sketches we made at the beginning. The new typeface is named CitKat. Later on we prepared three different short texts, which were written with three different typefaces. We compared the reading speed and number of fixations in each text, using a device that tracks eye movements. In conclusion, our script turned out to be more appropriate, contrary to what we initially expected. We confirmed the initial hypothesis, that serif typeface would be the best choice to use on the screen, as serifs help to guide the reader's eye across the page. digitalizacija linearna pisava pisava s serifi rokopis tipografija digitalization script sans serif typeface serif typeface typography true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2019-05-26 07:45:40 2019-05-26 07:45:42 2022-08-19 03:51:04 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2019 0 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1970-01-01 67635 3743.pdf 3743.pdf 1 147C9AD2CC0C219717703829DA5D7C1B 7a6705601eb1df02707bd071e69cefafcac65a71680ee78fc9432bb63a76fa7a 83e16389-a1b6-11eb-a523-00155dcfd717 https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=118686 Naravoslovnotehniška fakulteta 0 0 0